---BeginMessage---
John,
the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
him unless beaten by the .au team:
#4341783
#4341031
#4339058
#4338519
#4332119
#4330945
#4330174
#4330103
Bye
Frederik
--
On 14/04/10 07:25, Liz wrote:
the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
him unless beaten by the .au team:
I've cleaned up the duplications in much of the ACT (but not all). I
assume that won't
On 14 April 2010 07:46, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 14/04/10 07:25, Liz wrote:
the user has replied, apologised, and asked for help in reverting
several of his change sets. I will revert the following changesets for
him unless beaten by the .au team:
I've cleaned up the
On 14/04/10 07:51, John Smith wrote:
It's always better if they're reverted cleanly...
OK - time I did some research on how to revert things I guess.
John H
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 14 April 2010 08:04, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
OK - time I did some research on how to revert things I guess.
There is a handful of people that already do this, and imho it's best
to leave it up to them to prevent accidents and edit wars.
Hi,
As reported here the user has asked for help reverting... I will leave
it to the people who know what they are doing to follow this up.
Cheers
Neal
On 14/04/2010, at 7:25 AM, Liz wrote:
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: 14 April 2010 6:56:09 AM
To: John Smith
On 14/04/10 09:06, John Smith wrote:
There is a handful of people that already do this, and imho it's best
to leave it up to them to prevent accidents and edit wars.
Understood. But at least I now see why it's best to leave potential
reverts in their pristine state.
John H
7 matches
Mail list logo
