There are not that many words here, so it should be harder to go
astray, but the following lines present problems;
you must use the imagery as presented in the API, you cannot modify or edit the
imagery,
This part implies that you cannot use it as a layer, by modifying
the imagery with map
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 19:22 +0800, 4x4falcon wrote:
On 01/12/10 18:46, Andrew Laughton wrote:
you must use the imagery as presented in the API, you cannot modify or
edit the
imagery,
This part implies that you cannot use it as a layer, by modifying
the imagery with map overlays.
This post seems to indicate the legal issues have been sorted out, and
the terms the imagery can be used under:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Opengeodata/~3/kukbUtOllso/microsoft-imagery-details
I also started making a relation showing areas that Bing covers for Australia:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent. The thought does occur that if one used source=bing, and
started tracing now, and for some reason the legal agreement didn't
eventuate, it would be easy to simply wipe all that data. But that
would be making
On 25 November 2010 07:21, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:41:04 +1000
Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Planning to enable access is not the same as enabling access. So, at
the moment, we can't use it.
Merkaartor is ready to go, as soon as the
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Emilie Laffray
emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually all editors are ready to go as soon as we know the legal
circumstances. So people will be able to use their favorite editors to
access Bing imagery. That said, until we have the legalese, we should avoid
How are some people already claiming to be tracing? From what i've
seen, international users are already tracing their coverage areas. I
thought that Bing uses a different url to the standard
whatever.com/xyz that our editors (and NearMap) support. Is there
already a usable URL out there that can
Luke W. (lakeyboy) wrote:
Is there already a usable URL out there that can
be put into Potlatch 2 or other editors?
You could in theory use Bing right now in Potlatch 2 if you run your own
instance, but although the code's been written, none of the public instances
(Geowiki, MapQuest, or even
On 26 November 2010 08:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent. The thought does occur that if one used source=bing, and
started tracing now, and for some reason the legal agreement didn't
eventuate, it would be easy to simply wipe all that data. But that
would be making life
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
It's quite possible that they might end up saying - yes it can be
done, but not in certain areas, or some similar restriction. They get
imagery from a range of suppliers, and would have to check that they
are not breaking
MS allowing imagery to be used is great news, particularly in the
(temporary?) absence of Nearmap:
http://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/1602/how-can-i-use-microsofts-aerial-imagery-in-potlatch
Having a quick skim in one area, they obviously don't have the detail
of Nearmap but it's still
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping out the boundaries of the coverage? Should be interesting.
There is no news here until they actually allow it, so far they are
claiming they can't.
On 25 November 2010 03:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping out the boundaries of the coverage? Should be interesting.
There is no news
On 25 November 2010 13:20, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 03:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping
On 25 November 2010 13:20, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 03:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no news here until they actually allow it, so far they are
claiming they can't.
Interesting choice of words.
I think you'll find there
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:41:04 +1000
Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Planning to enable access is not the same as enabling access. So, at
the moment, we can't use it.
Merkaartor is ready to go, as soon as the legalities are OK.
from Merkaartor list
I guess we need a good way to use the
16 matches
Mail list logo
