On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 20:00 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
A nearmapper has decided that badly out-of-date nearmap imagery was
more authorative than my GPS traces (taken last weekend) and has
For anyone interested in the area, NearMap imagery of the new suburbs
(taken the Friday before Nicks
: Saturday, 14 May 2011 14:28
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Nearmap badly out of date
No I didn't though maybe I should have. There have been discussions (on these
lists) for a fer years now and the consensus opinion was that if you upload gps
tracks (and mine are all still
On 14/05/11 16:35, Ben Kelley wrote:
IMHO definitely put source=survey if it is. (e.g. from a gps track) It
can be difficult to determine this later.
E.g. I can see that there is a GPS track log nearby, but did the person
use it?
This brings up a point which I'd like clarification on.
When I
Ben Kelley wrote
E.g. I can see that there is a GPS track log nearby, but did the person use
it?
Yes, that was exactly the arguement If there is no source tag but there
is a public GPS trace uploaded to OSM, then the assumption is that it was
used to plot the way and that the tag
On 14/05/11 14:28, Nick Hocking wrote:
Ross wrote
Did you tag your ways with source=survey so that it would show them
that you had actually surveyed it?
No I didn't though maybe I should have. There have been discussions
(on these lists) for a fer years now and the consensus opinion was
Ross - fixed Liz O'Neill Street...
Thanks for fixing that Ross,
One tiny point though, the grassed over area is just the westbound section.
The bit from the corner to where my tracks end could more accurately be
tagged highway=residential access=no
Also, could you fix my naming error for me
On 11/05/11 20:00, Nick Hocking wrote:
A nearmapper has decided that badly out-of-date nearmap imagery was
more authorative than my GPS traces (taken last weekend) and has
completed a road that is not there any longer. It has been
completely grassed over so that cars can not travel along it, for
Ross wrote
Did you tag your ways with source=survey so that it would show them that
you had actually surveyed it?
No I didn't though maybe I should have. There have been discussions (on
these lists) for a fer years now and the consensus opinion was that if you
upload gps tracks (and mine are all
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
A nearmapper has decided that badly out-of-date nearmap imagery was
more authorative than my GPS traces (taken last weekend) and has
completed a road that is not there any longer. It has been
completely grassed over so
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
That's before you consider the resolution, it's so high that railway
lines and switching tracks are mapped so accurately people were
suggesting to those that make train games they could use OSM data as
the basis of
On 13 May 2011 15:38, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
That's before you consider the resolution, it's so high that railway
lines and switching tracks are mapped so accurately people were
suggesting to those
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2011 15:38, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's before you consider the resolution, it's so high that railway
lines
A nearmapper has decided that badly out-of-date nearmap imagery was
more authorative than my GPS traces (taken last weekend) and has
completed a road that is not there any longer. It has been
completely grassed over so that cars can not travel along it, for some
time to come, and barricades have
In other news, someone somewhere did something, and someone somewhere
should deal with it.
Would you care to point out what the problems are, or heaven forbid fix
them yourself? We've got this wonderful interface that anyone (even
you) can use to change data in the database that people have
14 matches
Mail list logo
