So how would you feel if someone had the full support of a small but vocal
group on discord and given pretty much free rein to revert every single one of
your edits because he got call out, well it's happening to me. I would like to
report theswavu for this edit Relation History: 13736691 |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13736691/history> he
deleted a restriction I put there to prevent u-turning from the service road.
This community seems to be all about winning a argument than giving a shit
about the map. I will be reporting him on his user page for this edit too.
________________________________
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org <talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 11:54:34 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 (Anthony Panozzo)
2. Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3 (Anthony Panozzo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 13:37:42 +0000
From: Anthony Panozzo <pan...@outlook.com>
To: Dean Scott <deanscott...@outlook.com>, "talk-au@openstreetmap.org"
<talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Message-ID:
<pr3p192mb0927c0b93ec616fe7823be68cc...@pr3p192mb0927.eurp192.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Yes martins road/waterloo corner road/bagster theswavu and randomly clicked
buttons again and allowed u-turns from 2 nodes away, I think his little
validator tool only works from 1 node or something, either way he has no local
knowledge of this area
From: Dean Scott<mailto:deanscott...@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2022 11:03 PM
To: Anthony Panozzo<mailto:pan...@outlook.com>;
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to
the intersection with traffic lights, the u-turn?s are correctly tagged. If
not, please point it out to us so we can better understand
Regards,
Scottie0001
From: Anthony Panozzo <pan...@outlook.com>
Date: Monday, 2 May 2022 at 10:57 pm
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Reporting user TheSwavu |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheSwavu>
2 hours ago he made this changeset Changeset: 120456255 |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120456255#map=17/-34.75536/138.63155>
he has allowed u-turns
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org <talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:30:24 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org (Sam Wilson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 11:01:40 +0800
From: Sam Wilson <s...@samwilson.id.au>
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com>
Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org
Message-ID: <2f617c9d-0456-971b-233c-90d2e54ea...@samwilson.id.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
It's growing in use, I think (not with Australia-specific discussion).
It feels like a pretty good site, I check the headlines most days, and I
think one advantage is being able to get a feel for what's being
discussed elsewhere. Also to have location-specific discussions that
benefit either from the input of people elsewhere or to let other people
know how one place is doing things.
I don't like the notification system that much, but part of that is I
think that the ratio of meta posts to real topical ones is quite large
at the moment. It is decreasing though, as more people take part.
?Sam
On 1/5/22 06:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> So how's it going after this first month?
>
> Any marked advantages / disadvantages over the existing mailing list?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:52, Sam Wilson <s...@samwilson.id.au> wrote:
>
> The new community.openstreetmap.org
> <https://community.openstreetmap.org> site is up and running.
>
> It's going to replace the old forum, including the users:
> Australia <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=24>
> subforum.
>
> I'm not sure if we should ask for an Australia category to be
> created on the new site. Probably not worth it until there's some
> amount of content relating to Australia.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/dda3550a/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
------------------------------
End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
***************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/c62b5c19/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 9DA24D861B064D15806B1D0EDA442F03.png
Type: image/png
Size: 140 bytes
Desc: 9DA24D861B064D15806B1D0EDA442F03.png
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/c62b5c19/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 14:24:00 +0000
From: Anthony Panozzo <pan...@outlook.com>
To: Dean Scott <deanscott...@outlook.com>, "talk-au@openstreetmap.org"
<talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Message-ID:
<pr3p192mb0927c4e3b56d18b49df32433cc...@pr3p192mb0927.eurp192.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
And also, if you really look hard enough into it, you will realise those
crosses at intersections do not break any OSM rules or policys. The no physical
divide argument is not valid because they do not represent two different roads,
this person is reverting edits he really knows nothing about.
________________________________
From: Dean Scott <deanscott...@outlook.com>
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 11:03:51 PM
To: Anthony Panozzo <pan...@outlook.com>; talk-au@openstreetmap.org
<talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to
the intersection with traffic lights, the u-turn?s are correctly tagged. If
not, please point it out to us so we can better understand
Regards,
Scottie0001
From: Anthony Panozzo <pan...@outlook.com>
Date: Monday, 2 May 2022 at 10:57 pm
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Reporting user TheSwavu |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheSwavu>
2 hours ago he made this changeset Changeset: 120456255 |
OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120456255#map=17/-34.75536/138.63155>
he has allowed u-turns
________________________________
From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org <talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:30:24 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org (Sam Wilson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 11:01:40 +0800
From: Sam Wilson <s...@samwilson.id.au>
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com>
Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org
Message-ID: <2f617c9d-0456-971b-233c-90d2e54ea...@samwilson.id.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
It's growing in use, I think (not with Australia-specific discussion).
It feels like a pretty good site, I check the headlines most days, and I
think one advantage is being able to get a feel for what's being
discussed elsewhere. Also to have location-specific discussions that
benefit either from the input of people elsewhere or to let other people
know how one place is doing things.
I don't like the notification system that much, but part of that is I
think that the ratio of meta posts to real topical ones is quite large
at the moment. It is decreasing though, as more people take part.
?Sam
On 1/5/22 06:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> So how's it going after this first month?
>
> Any marked advantages / disadvantages over the existing mailing list?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:52, Sam Wilson <s...@samwilson.id.au> wrote:
>
> The new community.openstreetmap.org
> <https://community.openstreetmap.org> site is up and running.
>
> It's going to replace the old forum, including the users:
> Australia <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=24>
> subforum.
>
> I'm not sure if we should ask for an Australia category to be
> created on the new site. Probably not worth it until there's some
> amount of content relating to Australia.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/dda3550a/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
------------------------------
End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3
***************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/cd8f0656/attachment.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
------------------------------
End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 6
***************************************
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
