On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 09:07, Andy Townsend wrote:
> What actually is it that you're referring to when you say "routing" above?
>
Testing routing via OSRM after putting a path along the beach still gives:
On 28/11/2021 22:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I tried putting a path along the beach, but routing still walks up to
the nearest road, along that, then back down onto the beach at the
other end?
What actually is it that you're referring to when you say "routing" above?
Different routers
Hi all
A similar problem with a nature walk,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360672204 it appears to be
unconnected to anything.
In reality it is leading off a mown picnic area. What is rendering
green there is the natural=wood. Maybe that wood should be converted
to a relation with
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 10:54, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Same problem where a bushwalking route uses a beach. I was told IIRC it
> is ok to use highway=path with trail_visibility=no.
>
Did that actually work for you?
I tried putting a path along the beach, but routing still walks
While I could place a track across each grassed area, the placement of
the track would be somewhat arbitrary.
Is there any point in trying to mark an area as walkable? In the example
link below, people can walk pretty much anywhere across the two grassed
areas, and it's only the track in
1/21 2:12 pm, osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote:
>
> Possibly path=link?
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Harvey
>
> *Sent:* Friday, 26 November 2021 12:34
> *To:* Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> <61sundow...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List
>
> *Subject:* Re:
t:* Re: [talk-au] Unconnected ways
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:54, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Same problem where a bushwalking route uses a beach. I was told
IIRC it
is ok to use highway=path with trail_visibility=no.
Agreed, and while I
Possibly path=link?
From: Andrew Harvey
Sent: Friday, 26 November 2021 12:34
To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Unconnected ways
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:54, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:54, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same problem where a bushwalking route uses a beach. I was told IIRC it
> is ok to use highway=path with trail_visibility=no.
>
Agreed, and while I still don't think it's perfect, it's probably the best
compromise at the
I've seen the solution Warin notes here in USA, too. "Walk along the beach"
(somewhat lengthily) yet the tide removes all the sandy footprints of any
implicit or explicit "trail." It's a route, though one that is invisible upon
the ground. But not among people who say "yep, mate, I'm walking
On 26/11/21 7:16 am, Tom Brennan wrote:
Quick question on unconnected ways.
I've just mapped one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006252416
Probably best viewed in edit mode with an aerial photo underlay.
This way is a physical path between two open grassed areas that
themselves have no
Quick question on unconnected ways.
I've just mapped one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006252416
Probably best viewed in edit mode with an aerial photo underlay.
This way is a physical path between two open grassed areas that
themselves have no discernible paths. So at this stage, all I
12 matches
Mail list logo
