On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 18:20 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 22 February 2010 17:56, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure but being traced and annotated makes it much
*easier* for people to retrieve information about your private
property (e.g. through an API call).
On 22 February 2010 19:07, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
A water supply company could be interested to know how many pools are in
an area to know what areas might have higher demand during filling
season. But, a pool cleaning business in the future might search on the
map to find
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 19:10 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 22 February 2010 19:07, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
A water supply company could be interested to know how many pools are in
an area to know what areas might have higher demand during filling
season. But, a pool cleaning
On 22 February 2010 19:31, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
No, what Im say(ing) is, Im unsure if theres a privacy issue, and asking
for others opinions or if theres any precedents to follow (other than
the court cases brought against google for invasion of privacy).
I really can't
On 22 February 2010 19:43, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I'm concerned about marking what are actual terrorist targets (not the media
frenzy type terrorists who are at airports)
telephone exchange, communications tower, power lines
things not usually well mapped in commercial offerings but
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:28 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Ive been wondering about the idea of mapping private pools in the same
way as private tennis courts have been marked, but been worried about
some issues, particularly privacy. With the mapping of tennis courts
taking
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I don't think it's reasonable to map anything on a
residential property
I wonder if any lawyer/privacy expert/etc. has written on this subject before...
___
Talk-au
Well the story is, I just happened to be drawing roads in Portsea one
day and I thought it would be a bit of a laugh to show off how the
rich holidaymakers spend their time! People say Portsea has a tennis
culture, now the map proves it! I am curious to know if Portsea has
the highest
On 23 February 2010 07:20, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I don't think it's reasonable to map anything on a
residential property, particularly not anything that can't be seen
from the street. I'm not sure why lakeboy did all this, but my
preference would be to tag it
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 08:20 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
Personally I don't think it's reasonable to map anything on a
residential property, particularly not anything that can't be seen
from the street.
Because, people in the air could be helped by being able to reference
pools, power lines or
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:43 +1100, Liz wrote:
I'm concerned about marking what are actual terrorist targets (not the media
frenzy type terrorists who are at airports)
telephone exchange, communications tower, power lines
things not usually well mapped in commercial offerings but which if
On 23 February 2010 12:50, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Havent you heard the new technique? These days the PR arm of the
media-terrorists simply have to say 'were planning something at airport
xyz' and the government machine will kick into action and cause chaos at
the airport
Heh, yeah, I assumed it was something like that. It's ok to have the
data in there, I guess, but I don't think it should render on the
default mapnik. If for no other reason than we want *public* tennis
courts to be visible, and all those private ones just create a lot of
noise. Maybe not an
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I don't think it's reasonable to map anything on a
residential property
What about
1) The number on the letter box
2) A power pole that happens to be present on a private block
3) The roofline (as in
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
... I don't think it should render on the
default mapnik. If for no other reason than we want *public* tennis
courts to be visible, and all those private ones just create a lot of
noise.
Just add access=private (or
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Luke Woolley lswool...@gmail.com wrote:
Mainly because I normally give landuses a -3 layer and for things that
sit just above or directly on the ground I give the next layer up.
Probably doesn't need it, but it will do no harm being there.
Ah, I had wondered
It could be argued that the location of pools, even if private, would
be a valuable knowledgebase in fire and other emergencies.
You are not saying whose pool it is, or who has a pool, only that
there is a pool at this location. But I would nevertheless be
interested in the privacy implications,
On 22 February 2010 13:28, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Ive been wondering about the idea of mapping private pools in the same
way as private tennis courts have been marked, but been worried about
some issues, particularly privacy. With the mapping of tennis courts
How are there
come the revolution, comrades!
:)
jim
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Check it out:
http://osm.org/go/uGm91mHAN-
I cracked up when I saw it. We can blame lakeboy for this one...
Steve
___
Talk-au
19 matches
Mail list logo
