This seems like a good case where the road is being actively dismantled.
I think the only reason to keep it at all is where you can see the
ex-road in imagery, so you want people who are editing to know that this
thing doesn't actually exist.
- Ben.
On 27/11/19 09:32, Warin wrote:
I would
On 26/11/19 23:01, Ian Steer wrote:
Nanga Rd in WA’s south west has been affected by bauxite mining and
has been re-routed. I’m hesitant to simply delete the old alignment,
and am wondering whether there is an appropriate tag like
“demolished=yes” to use on it instead ?
If it is still
I would recommend
(1) changing highway=* to demolished:highway=*
(2) adding note tag explaining situation
(3) deleting geometry in far future, when there is no risk of remapping it
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:demolished%3Dyes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
On 26/11/2019 12:01, Ian Steer wrote:
Nanga Rd in WA’s south west has been affected by bauxite mining and
has been re-routed. I’m hesitant to simply delete the old alignment,
and am wondering whether there is an appropriate tag like
“demolished=yes” to use on it instead ?
Deleting the
4 matches
Mail list logo
