Andrew et al,
The mapper may have used an out of copyright map or document. Is the
fence still in use or has myxo and Calicivirus made it redundant?
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 10:17, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> Warin, thanks for raising. I've asked the mapper to confirm their sources,
> I'll see what
Warin, thanks for raising. I've asked the mapper to confirm their sources,
I'll see what they say first.
Mike, good point. As it stands due to reasons given at
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ we need a
waiver to use CC BY data in OSM. In Queensland as listed at
Hi there
Queensland Governments open data is quite extensive. I would discourage
digitizing of this fence in favour of importing the actual data available from
the Agriculture department
Metadata (read more at:
I agree with your concern. Some imagery may permit an experienced eye to
identify a fence line. However identification of a particular fence by name
would need more than the satellite imagery. If the source of other info
including name is copyrighted, then it's inclusion in OSM is not
Hi,
A remote mapper is adding a fence line to OSM.
I believe the imagery detail is not sufficient to map this fence alone.
See relation 10703889 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10703889).
I think the remote mapper is using the website https://www.ddmrb.org.au/
to establish where
5 matches
Mail list logo
