No, I would leave it as 2 separate airfields, with the same info
against both.
If that causes a problem, then take the codes off the airbase, as strictly
speaking, that side of the airfield isn't an air transport destination.
Thanks
Graeme
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 22:10, Nemanja Bracko
Thank you all for clarification.
Thank you James for more local details.
So by your opinion is it better to have 2 separate airports with duplicated
data (such as IATA, ICAO, etc.), or to combine into one polygon.
Taking into consideration Cleary's and Andrew's answer I would leave as is, but
It is a military base that allows civilian air traffic to use its runway.
As far as air traffic goes it's called Williamtown, only the civilian terminal
area is called Newcastle airport. (28 hectares of land)
https://www.newcastleairport.com.au/corporate/about/board-governance
Hope that helps,
I agree with cleary, that I think these are two different airports but
share the same runway, but likewise I'm also not familiar enough to say for
sure.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 19:32, cleary wrote:
>
>
> I think the air force base and civilian airport share the same runway but
> they are two
I think the air force base and civilian airport share the same runway but they
are two distinct entities with separate buildings etc. Same applies in some
other cities including Canberra. I would defer to someone more knowledgeable
but I think it remains appropriate to have two separate
Hi,
There are two relations in OSM that are referring to the same airport:
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
