Re: [talk-au] Tagging reserve of unknown size?

If you're not able to determine even a rough boundary or area then a node is best. If I have an idea of the area based on a few signs and different locations, I'll draw a rough way based on that and add a fixme. There's no single tag for anything named "Reserve", sometimes they are amenity=park,

[talk-au] Tagging reserve of unknown size?

Hi, I've just added Normans Reserve based on a sign at the entrance . There is no indication as to what area Normans Reserve covers - so I added it as a node and not an area. I've tagged it as

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 19:09, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Andrew Harvey , wrote: > > For these "routes" though there is no clear A to B, there will be short > segments which are obivously part of a route because there are arrows > directing cyclists, but sometimes these are just short segments to

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

Andrew Harvey , wrote: > For these "routes" though there is no clear A to B, there will be short > segments which are obivously part of a route because there are arrows > directing cyclists, but sometimes these are just short segments to the next > intersection so it's unclear where the route

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

For these "routes" though there is no clear A to B, there will be short segments which are obivously part of a route because there are arrows directing cyclists, but sometimes these are just short segments to the next intersection so it's unclear where the route goes from and to, hence why someone

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

On 25 Apr 2020, 09:53 +0100, Andrew Harvey , wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 18:49, Richard Fairhurst > > wrote: > > > Relations with type=route are for routes, with a defined start and end. > > > Not > > > for networks. If you want to put them all in a single relation, then do it > > >

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 18:49, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Tom Brennan wrote: > > However, if I go over to Cammeray, someone has added all of the ways > > to a single relation (named Cammeray Local Routes, tagged with > > lcn=yes and network=lcn). > > Yeah, please don't do that. :) > > Relations

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

Tom Brennan wrote: > However, if I go over to Cammeray, someone has added all of the ways > to a single relation (named Cammeray Local Routes, tagged with > lcn=yes and network=lcn). Yeah, please don't do that. :) Relations with type=route are for routes, with a defined start and end. Not for

Re: [talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 15:13, Tom Brennan wrote: > On 25/04/2020 11:46 am, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 08:57, Tom Brennan > > wrote: > >> 1. Infrastructure: Painted road markings (but no cycle lane) and/or > >> street signs indicating cycle route: cycleway=shared_lane eg >