Re: [talk-au] Tracks flagged as missing from government data

I've done some spot checks on the VIC priority, and I see they're also included in the Track VIC challenge. Although the 316 in VIC Priority will be a small dent in the 249850 in Tracks VIC. Many of the ones in Tracks VIC seem to be driveways (certainly in the Melbourne periphery that I scanned

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 21:19, Andrew Harvey wrote: > And this one definitely should be inverted: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761 > > > Agreed. Surprise no one fixed this already, I've done so now. > > On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

Aug 16, 2021, 13:14 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: > On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <> > talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> Are you allowed as a cyclist to leave sidewalk using them? >> > > Well in NSW you can't cycle on the sidewalk... >   > I was also

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

> > And this one definitely should be inverted: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761 Agreed. Surprise no one fixed this already, I've done so now. On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Are you allowed as a

Re: [talk-au] Tracks flagged as missing from government data

> Thanks for a great series of projects Andrew. One query… is there an error in > the Victorian all tracks challenge? It includes nearly 250,000 tracks to be > reviewed and potentially added to OSM. By contrast, taginfo states that there > are “only” 188,000 tracks (highway=track) in OSM across