Hi John
thanks for your input, and gentle reminder to explain some thinking:
yes, we’re optimistic that we’ll get a lot of great talk proposals!
There’s a bit of to and fro about more/shorter talks, and fewer/longer
talks. Do we prefer 60 short sharp (15+5) talks or 48 (20+)5 talks? A lot
of
Thanks Adam & program committee, looking great!
The adjustment to having more talks is interesting, I suppose there may be
a bit of a challenge to fill 60 speaking slots out of an audience of 170,
but hey, challenges are good! And personally, I'm hopeful we exceed the 170
target, though it will
2 matches
Mail list logo
