Re: [talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,

On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 08:32, Phil Wyatt wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > There was a proposal back in 2016 (well after the first use of the damage > tag) and it seems to have stalled, maybe because tagging damage has been > found to be less effective than hoped > > > > >

Re: [talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,

: OSM-Au Subject: Re: [talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu, On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:27, Phil Wyatt mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> > wrote: From: Russell Deffner mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org> > Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM To: Warin <61sundow...@gm

Re: [talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:27, Phil Wyatt wrote: > > From: Russell Deffner > Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM > To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> > Cc: h...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu, > > Just a quick note; HOT does not formally do damage tagging,

[talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,

Hi Folks, This just popped into the HOT mailing list - very topical at the moment and may be worth taking to the SSSI event organisers Cheers - Phil -Original Message- From: Russell Deffner Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Cc: