Re: [talk-au] From the Australian Wiki page possible simplification of comments on the access tag

2016-07-02 Thread David Bannon 
Hmm, yes Warin, I agree, I don't really understand what that para is 
trying to tell me.

Your alternative seems reasonable. Shorter, clearer.

David

On 03/07/16 08:33, Warin wrote:

Hi,

On the Australian tagging guidelines wiki page there are various 
comments on the use of the access tag. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Access_roads_on_public_land 




The present content is, to say the least, confusing and may give the 
wrong impression.


For example most access roads in National Parks that are restricted in 
some way for access have signs on them .. surely these are clear 
enough to add the correct access tag? A sign saying "Authorised 
Vehicles Only" would be tagged access=private? And that can simply be 
stated?




___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] From the Australian Wiki page possible simplification of comments on the access tag

2016-07-02 Thread Warin 

Hi,

On the Australian tagging guidelines wiki page there are various 
comments on the use of the access tag. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Access_roads_on_public_land 




The present content is, to say the least, confusing and may give the 
wrong impression.


For example most access roads in National Parks that are restricted in 
some way for access have signs on them .. surely these are clear enough 
to add the correct access tag? A sign saying "Authorised Vehicles Only" 
would be tagged access=private? And that can simply be stated?




___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au