Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-23 Thread Ross Scanlon
 On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
  airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
  I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
  situation.
 
  Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the
  situation?
 
 
 Check out this link:
 http://www.airservices.gov.au/publications/current/ersa/FAC_YSWG_3-Jun-2010.pdf
  it may give you some more guidance.

For anyone contemplating using these here is the copyright notice:

http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/aip.asp

and they are quite strict on usage.


-- 
Cheers
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-23 Thread John Smith
On 23 July 2010 15:31, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:53 +1000
 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:

 something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
 access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
 you can get permission to transit according the PDF...

 Only if your a civil aircraft on contract to the military (...all transient 
 MIL and civil/MIL acft...), if the civil/MIL was civil then yes you could get 
 permission.

Anyone tagged roads with access=* on military bases? If so, what
access=* value(s) were used?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-23 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:31:56 +1000
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:

 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:53 +1000
 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
  access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
  you can get permission to transit according the PDF...
 
 Only if your a civil aircraft on contract to the military (...all transient 
 MIL and civil/MIL acft...), if the civil/MIL 
was civil then yes you could get permission.

This should have read:

Only if your a civil aircraft on contract to the military (...all transient 
MIL and civil/MIL acft...), if the civil/MIL 
was civil then you could NOT get permission.


-- 
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-23 Thread Liz
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, John Smith wrote:
 It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
 airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
 I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
 situation.
 
 Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the
 situation?
 

There is an area which is a air force base
areas which are general aviation stuff
shared air traffic control and runways

been inside the base twice but about 10 years ago now


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread John Smith
It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
situation.

Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the situation?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread Babstar
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:

 It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
 airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
 I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
 situation.

 Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the
 situation?


Check out this link:
http://www.airservices.gov.au/publications/current/ersa/FAC_YSWG_3-Jun-2010.pdf
 it may give you some more guidance.

--
Babstar
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread John Smith
On 23 July 2010 14:39, Babstar babsta...@gmail.com wrote:
 Check out this link:
 http://www.airservices.gov.au/publications/current/ersa/FAC_YSWG_3-Jun-2010.pdf
  it may give you some more guidance.

Thanks for that, it shows the airport split up more or less how I
split the mutipolygon relations, it also highlighted an unpaved runway
I failed to notice...

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:39:05 +1000
Babstar babsta...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:46 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  It looks like it's half a military airfield and half a commercial
  airport and I've sort of split it up with a couple of relations but
  I'm not entirely sure what I've done accurately describes the
  situation.
 
  Is anyone familiar with Wagga airport able to comment further on the
  situation?
 
 
 Check out this link:
 http://www.airservices.gov.au/publications/current/ersa/FAC_YSWG_3-Jun-2010.pdf
  it may give you some more guidance.
 
 --
 Babstar

Not really usable as they are copyright.

The airport is joint RAAF civil, when I worked there in 1986 the division was 
the edge of the apron between the control tower building and the hangars so 
what you have is fairly close.

Other comments on this (and it's probably more of a limitation of osm) is that 
not all that you have marked as taxiways are.  When the lines you've marked as 
taxiways cross onto an apron then the taxiway ends there so at the main apron 
from the yellow and red line where taxi 'C' crosses that is no longer a 
taxiway.  Likewise where it continues onto the military apron.

Also the filet lines onto the runway are not taxiways there only guidance lines 
the taxiways there join like a t intersection with no link roads.


-- 
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread John Smith
On 23 July 2010 15:13, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
 Not really usable as they are copyright.

It was useful as confirmation, rather than copying...

 The airport is joint RAAF civil, when I worked there in 1986 the division was 
 the edge of the apron between the control tower building and the hangars so 
 what you have is fairly close.

 Other comments on this (and it's probably more of a limitation of osm) is 
 that not all that you have marked as taxiways are.  When the lines you've 
 marked as taxiways cross onto an apron then the taxiway ends there so at the 
 main apron from the yellow and red line where taxi 'C' crosses that is no 
 longer a taxiway.  Likewise where it continues onto the military apron.

I had no idea what to tag those as, and there was nothing on map
features page to describe these better, feel free to tag them as
something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
you can get permission to transit according the PDF...

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread Ross Scanlon
 On 23 July 2010 15:13, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
  Not really usable as they are copyright.
 
 It was useful as confirmation, rather than copying...

Useful information for anyone else considering using them as well then.
 
 I had no idea what to tag those as, and there was nothing on map
 features page to describe these better, feel free to tag them as
 something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
 access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
 you can get permission to transit according the PDF...

As I said probably a limitation of osm.

access=military is good as that's the limitation rather than private.  It is 
correct for the areas as marked. 


-- 
Cheers
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wagga Wagga Airport

2010-07-22 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:

 something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
 access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
 you can get permission to transit according the PDF...

Only if your a civil aircraft on contract to the military (...all transient MIL 
and civil/MIL acft...), if the civil/MIL was civil then yes you could get 
permission.

 


-- 
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au