Thanks Andrew, looks excellent.
I did record 2 full GPX tracks for all streets. Would you like me to
send them to you at your gmail acct for a cross check?
I also covered the laneway and access to the railway station from the
Brolga Street side and Murana Road on the other. I have dashcam
>> Bing is almost right: -0.15; 1.79
> I get -0.10;1.50 which, considering...
I only eyeballed it by trying to move the imagery such that fence lines matched
up with DCDB parcel boundaries... so I would say that's well within margin of
error.
___
by JOSM, not iD and
other editors.
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2021 12:20
To: Andrew Davidson
Cc: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Way errors in Quilpie Qld
Is there any way for all of the various sets of imagery
Is there any way for all of the various sets of imagery to be automatically
corrected to each other to get around this problem?
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 12:02, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 10:46 PM Thorsten Engler via Talk-au
> wrote:
> > I would assume that
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 10:46 PM Thorsten Engler via Talk-au
wrote:
> I would assume that the lot boundaries recorded in DCDB are "exact" and any
> discrepancy between them and the physical world come down to the margin of
> errors the surveyors did when placing boundary pegs at some point.
I
t more GPS data to see if it's
possible to derive a comparable offset for the imagery layers purely from
that.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cameron
Sent: Saturday, 2 October 2021 20:40
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Way errors in Quilpie Qld
Wow, what a change
Bob, Quilpie seems to have a good coverage on the Strava Heatmap. I can only
see the low res version atm. I’ll have a look at the high res version next time
I’m on the computer. It’s quite likely that the high res heatmap has a much
higher density of gps traces than do the OSM gps tracks. If
Wow, what a changeset!
Bing was 2010-2012. The Maxar Premium seems the most recent.
Whatever the case with the buildings, the roads tend to be used as
anchors for many features. I guess the opinion I am looking for is that
if a formal source can't be found/used, will my GPS run tomorrow (plus
On 2/10/21 5:27 pm, Bob Cameron wrote:
I am currently near this nice quiet place and am leaving shortly.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.6176/144.2666
I note that there is a fairly large discrepancy between some of the
roads and the public GPS traces. The main E-W highway is also
I am currently near this nice quiet place and am leaving shortly.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.6176/144.2666
I note that there is a fairly large discrepancy between some of the
roads and the public GPS traces. The main E-W highway is also split, but
not in OSM. Imagery and GPS
10 matches
Mail list logo
