On 29/3/23 14:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au
wrote:
Since the coastline tag is also supposed to represent the high
water mark then I would say that they should be snapped together
(since they then represent the same feature - that is,
On 29/3/23 14:30, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au
wrote:
Since the coastline tag is also supposed to represent the high
water mark then I would say that they should be snapped together
(since they then represent the same feature - that is,
On 28/3/23 20:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I would advise caution with this.
Government bodies will typically hold their own GIS data for park
boundaries or administrative boundaries, and the GIS data they have
will never fully align with the coastline.
However, it is not our job to be
On 28/3/23 22:06, Little Maps wrote:
Slightly different issue… but the accuracy of governmental admin
boundaries can vary a lot depending where you are in Aus. In regional
NSW, allotment boundaries (and associated park, state forest and local
gov boundaries) as shown on the NSW gov base map
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 20:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As for the administrative boundaries .. the present official view is
> that local councils cannot now sell 'land' between the high tide and low
> tide, however they have in the past.
>
> What the state of this 'land' between
5 matches
Mail list logo
