re a large amount of effort however, unless it was
automated which I know a lot of people do not like.
(Sorry Ross for the duplicate email, I realised I forgot to hit reply all)
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@mapbox.com
On 10 November 2015 at 18:46, Ross <i...@4x4falcon.com> wrote:
> To me you
to match the rest of the state. Also
in Queensland national route 1 from Cairns heading out west is also trunk
when at most it should be primary since it does not connect to a major city.
I welcome any feedback or suggestions.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@mapbox.com
__
At least the states are internally consistent. :-) and South Australia is
> all fine :-) :-)
>
> Alex
>
> On 10 Nov 2015, at 6:46 PM, Leith Bade <le...@mapbox.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ross and Micheal,
>
> Fair enough. Perhaps instead of trying to change the refs t
Hi Mark,
Interesting, I will have a look at that.
We hope in the future to also make use of route relations, however the key
piece of software (osm2pgsql) we use to work with OSM does not support them.
One of my colleagues has been working on a replacement for that software.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
local
community will have a better sense of if the locals consider a place to be
a town or a village.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@mapbox.com
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
by Census. Hopefully these get picked up.
However maybe these significant towns should be made "cities" for the
purposes of OSM to remain consistent. E.g. Port Macquarie is technically
still a town, but is bigger than a number of regional NSW cities.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@mapbox.com
On 13 No
tags should I add? I was going to add name=Googong Foreshores,
source:geometry=NSW LPI Base Map and source:date=2017-11-27
I checked in JOSM and the boundary appears to align well with other
existing features, e.g. a fence and the other adjoining nature reserves.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
:-( looks like not much progress has been made on supporting protected_area
- https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/603
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 29 November 2017 at 07:48, Leith Bade <le...@bade.nz> wrote:
> Does the renderer support the protected
I agree as I recently encountered this issue. Following the GitHub issue on
the protected area tag, it seems support in the renderer is a still the
source of a large amount of debate and argument because of the large number
of clases and regional variations in use of the tag.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
in trees). I haven't dug into how they are tagged
in the US.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 7 December 2017 at 12:20, Leith Bade <le...@bade.nz> wrote:
> I agree as I recently encountered this issue. Following the GitHub issue
> on the protected area tag, it seems support in
at standalone GPS receiver like a Ublox M8
based device, that uses an external magnetic antenna you put on your car's
roof.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 12 June 2018 at 12:39, Alex Sims wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m really wanting to have better accuracy from GPS for use with
> Op
and
open them up to the public, so expect things to be much better next year.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 12 June 2018 at 20:34, Grant Slater wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have 2 of these for RTK GNSS receivers: https://emlid.com/reachrs/
>
> 1 ReachRS unit becomes the RTK static
s (at most). So
I wouldn't worry too much about the drift as there are other larger sources
of error in OpenStreetMaps.
The SBAS trial is available to anyone with a receiver that can be set to
use PRN 122 (e.g. Ublox devices).
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 12 June 2018 at 12:56, Andrew Har
-to-street. But if you were to survey the road compared to data in
NSW it could all be shifted by a metres.
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On 12 June 2018 at 20:29, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 12/06/18 20:04, Leith Bade wrote:
>
>> Our receivers work fine in Australia as I live
14 matches
Mail list logo
