Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

a looser qry (and XML readable ;-) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ffa Think it never existed at all, the zero point is the license change, i.e. around april 2010 I believe. It's not really totally clear on that btw, if you happen to see augmented diffs with negative numbering, they are from before

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

I've been trying to get older versions with the augmented diff in Overpass. But either it never did exist, or I'm not doing it right: see for example http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ff5 ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

There are 2 users who are quite busy in that area, plenty of changesets: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lf6648 The changesets I've checked haven't got landuse mods present. I've scanned 1.6 million changesets of the last 30 days and none have the keyword 'landuse' in the comments in that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

Something does show up at zoom level 9, so removal might be relatively recent. Strangely enough, I cannot seem to find any deleted objects where the outline used to be. At least, not with Potlatch 1. 2016-03-25 9:24 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe : > At least, on our map :) >

[OSM-talk-be] Liege n'est pas residential

At least, on our map :) My theory is someone mapped it in low detail, someone else deleted that huge polygon but didn't finish mapping in detail yet (or never did start). Anyone know what's going on? (maybe the line or relation is just broken?) I'm tempted to quickly draw a simple outline for