After looking into it further, I can only agree. I added the missing members
back (one way and a few junctions that were probably overlooked by previous
mappers), but every roundabout and double road "cuts off" the automatic
ordering by JOSM.
It seems to consider that a loop breaks the relation
The "problem" with N roads is that they are not linear features, they
split, recombine, have dangling dead ends, roundabouts and so on.
Yes, you can group some of the elements, but the next time you sort, other
groups may be formed, so it's arbitrary.
Jo
Op ma 3 sep. 2018 om 20:03 schreef André
On 2018-09-03 00:24, Jo wrote:
for route=road relations order doesn't matter much. It's impossible to
sort them according to any meaningful criterion.
A meaningful criterion to sort a route is so that two adjacent ways of
it share one same end node.
In other words, that the route is ordered the
for route=road relations order doesn't matter much. It's impossible to sort
them according to any meaningful criterion.
Polyglot
Op zo 2 sep. 2018 om 22:54 schreef Nathan Monfils :
> Hello!
>
> I was doing some editing on the N30 near Liège, when I noticed that its
> relation was completely
Hello!
I was doing some editing on the N30 near Liège, when I noticed that its
relation was completely unordered, with ways near the city center being next
to ways much further south (see relation `124374`).
The wiki defines a relation as an *ordered list*, yet only mentions order for
bus
