> It does however show a bigger problem: it's very difficult to notice that
something is removed in real-life, and adapt OSM to reflect the reality.
Now we know these phones are removed. But the same would hold for all other
types of POI.
True that. Luckily, phone boots are shown quite
It's better to do it manually. It wouldn't surprise me if some emergency
phones are tagged (wrongly) with this tag. So a manual correction could
find these.
Meanwhile, it doesn't bother me too buch that these are still present.
Everyone in Belgium knows that there are no more public phones, so
Last year, M!dgard got some complaints on his blog entry when he
proposed such a mechanical edit.
regards
m
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Jakka wrote:
> May all the public telephone cells in Belgium be cleaned up even if there is
> no oparator tag proximus or
May all the public telephone cells in Belgium be cleaned up even if
there is no oparator tag proximus or belgacom ?
I seem to remember that a other operator (English ???) try to place
public phone in railway stations and other public places, but do not
find info on the internet about this.
Seems like we didn't manage the clean up of public telephone cells in Belgium.
There are still 296 telephones left.
Het lijkt erop dat we er nog niet in geslaagd zijn om de
telefooncellen in Belgiƫ te verwijderen.
Er zijn er nog 296 gemapped.
[out:xml]
[timeout:600];