Re: [OSM-talk-be] sidewalk as ways or tags

2011-03-20 Thread Ben Laenen
Renaud MICHEL wrote: > You mean that a pedestrian is allowed to cross aven a national road > anywhere he wants, and even walk on it? Walk on it: at certain conditions, yes: no sidewalk that can be walked on, no walkable shoulders, and no traffic signs explicitly forbidding it. Also have to walk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] sidewalk as ways or tags

2011-03-20 Thread Renaud MICHEL
On samedi 19 mars 2011 at 18:09, Ben Laenen wrote : > Renaud MICHEL wrote: > > He argues that the mapnik rendering of this show how irrationnal it is > > (which is a personnal preference on which I differ) and that those > > should be tagged on the main way. > > I personnally think that it is more

Re: [OSM-talk-be] sidewalk as ways or tags

2011-03-19 Thread Ben Laenen
Renaud MICHEL wrote: > Hello > > I have recently had a small edit war with user nondidju regarding my > tracing of sidewalks as separate ways, see > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7461451 > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7528743 This is the whole "tag cycleways as wa

[OSM-talk-be] sidewalk as ways or tags

2011-03-19 Thread Renaud MICHEL
Hello I have recently had a small edit war with user nondidju regarding my tracing of sidewalks as separate ways, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7461451 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7528743 He argues that the mapnik rendering of this show how irrationnal it is