Hello everyone,
I'm new to this list but I've been doing some mapping in Brussels for
a few months.
Recently, I have been tracking bus stops in my area and found an
interesting case: the bus line 41 from the STIB/MIVB.
Its route happens to be different on weekdays and during the weekend,
due to t
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:47:31 +, Karel Adams wrote:
> Further to Gauthier's message relating to Belgian Railways: it seems
> obvious to me that LINE NUMBERS should be published, not train
> indicators. Compare to bars/cafés: we should mention the NAME of the
> place, not what beers are on ta
Further to Gauthier's message relating to Belgian Railways: it seems
obvious to me that LINE NUMBERS should be published, not train
indicators. Compare to bars/cafés: we should mention the NAME of the
place, not what beers are on tap or what food they serve.
After all, services offered on a rai
gvdmo...@skynet.be wrote:
> Should a way/relation relative to a railway line be described as a
> �line� of the SNCB/NMBS (with the focus on the service, the operator,
> the destinations, and so) or a physical infrastructure of Infrabel (with
> the focus on the technical characteristics) ?
>
> Now
Newby on OSM, I see that a lot of good work is completed about the
railway network, but it seems that the relevant tags are not always
consistent.
Should a way/relation relative to a railway line be described as a
«line» of the SNCB/NMBS (with the focus on the service, the operator,
the destinati
