Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade: http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary/hr
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the
2009/12/3 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade
Vjerojatnije samo dvojica pišu o tome. :)
Ima ljudi koji se strgaju od posla, ali nisu blogerski tip. Mogu iz osobnog
iskustva sa nedavnog zajedničkog mapiranja
Kada sam prije par mjeseci gledao Križevci su bili dosta slabo ucrtani na
karti, a pogledajte sada: http://osm.org/go/0Iu1JR57--
Pohvale Dim-u (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dim), koliko vidim on je
glavni krivac za ovako dobru kartu. Ako je još netko radio na Križevcima
javite se.
Ako
2009/11/29 Dražen Odobašić dodoba...@gmail.com
Toliko od mene, napišite dojmove...
Ne znam prati li Marko ovu listu, ali očito je pisao o mapiranju u nedjelju,
a nije ovdje javio. :)
http://akuzativ.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/tumarati-s-neznancima/
Željko
Marjan Vrban wrote:
Evo malo sam uvatio vremena pa slažem ceste prema onoj birokratskoj
shemi, za koju mislim da ju je prihvatila većina? Jel to izglasano ili šta
da se wiki već sredi, i da imamo pravila kartiranja za RH.
Evo mog prijedloga, može ići i u wiki ako se slažete:
1. primary -
On Četvrtak, 03. Prosinac 2009. 10:20:31 Valent Turkovic wrote:
Ako je vjerovati unisima u hrvatskom dnevniku samo dvojica mappera nesto
rade: http://www.openstreetmap.org/diary/hr
Ako je ovo bio pokušaj nagovaranja na pisanje dnevnika na OSM-u, podržavam :)
no naravno da ima više od dvoje
I'm a bit confused, in the past Aurora is part of Quezon Province
(hence Region 4), but Wikipedia says its part of region 3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_the_Philippines
Can someone enlighten me. Thanks in advance.
--
cheers,
maning
Just a reminder, we will have a micro-mapping meetup on Saturday
December 12, 2009. This event coincides with OSM's Christmas Party.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Christmas_Party_2009
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:17 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's mark this date!
Hi Lennard and the others.
Perhaps you can explain how 'abandoned' and 'disused' SHOULD be
interpreted in relation to the rendering rules. As far as I have seen,
the wiki pages about railways do not mention this.
If both should appear on the map, then probably 'historical tracks' that
are no
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:11:15 +0100, Luc Van den Troost wrote
Hi Lennard and the others.
(...)
Historical items then might be mapped in a different way that is usefull
for, for instance, a separate rendering or different layer. That
would not only be the case for historical railway tracks,
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:11:15 +0100, Luc Van den Troost
luc.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another 'historical' point is that it is a pitty that OSM doesn't offer
a kind of 'time-machine'. On one side it would be nice to see the growth
of OSM that way, on the other side the map we are currently making
Luc Van den Troost wrote:
Perhaps you can explain how 'abandoned' and 'disused' SHOULD be
interpreted in relation to the rendering rules. As far as I have seen,
the wiki pages about railways do not mention this.
I can only explain at the moment how these situations handled on the
mapnik
On 03/12/2009, at 6:12 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
We have now fully updated the OSM Contributors agreement section of the
main proposal. I hope that meets concerns about clarity of the change-over
process.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf
A while ago on the
James Livingston doc...@... writes:
The reason (well, my version) for a share-alike licence is that people who use
OSM data have to release theirs, we can merge that in, and everyone benefits
from the extra data going around. ODbL help that because (I'm serious hoping)
that we could combine two
... Yes, fully agreed ... (and I wasn't being terribly serious as it was
getting near time to go and open a bottle of foreign wine (;) and watch a
movie).
Although it may sometimes be useful to supplement the internationally
applicable / useful with an indication of regional / national
Hi,
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we should have much improved
map data.
Regards,
- M -
___
talk
Can I draw some attention to this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road
I was going to propose exactly the same thing, pretty much. Maybe I'd
quibble with some of the naming.
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders well: usually the street name is written
twice, the one-way arrows get messy etc.
Begin forwarded message:
From: paul everett tap...@t-online.de
Date: 3 December 2009 04:57:41 GMT
To: legal-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: question about commercial use. import of data in OSM format
Hi,
I am a plugin developer, developing plugins for cinema4D. I am
working on a
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Richard Mann
That's a problem with the rendering, not with the mapping.
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest it's a
mapping problem. Don't make work for
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's a problem with the rendering, not with the mapping.
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest
Sorry, one last example, also nearby:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.826282lon=144.947554zoom=18layers=B000FTF
This mess might be much more understandable if pairs of lanes that
were physically together were rendered as pairs (with a line between
them), and those that were on separate
On 03/12/2009, at 10.39, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there
is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory. Even disregarding the effort, the
end result never renders well: usually the street name is
Ok, I've mocked up what it might look like.
Complicated to show you though:
1) http://www.geowiki.com/halcyon/
2) Lat: -37.821995 Lon: 144.919573
3) Add these lines to the of end of the big edit box:
way[highway=service][!divider]
{ color: white; width: 3; casing-width: 5; }
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Can I draw some attention to this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road
I was going to propose exactly the same thing, pretty much. Maybe I'd
quibble with some of the naming.
I am also working on a proposal (let's
That's great news Margus, thanks for letting us know!
I'm always pleased to see more CORINE :)
Cheers, Joseph
2009/12/3 Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee:
Hi,
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it allows to define things like: there is a kerb between the footway and the
street, but on given nodes there is a lowered kerb to crossover.
Yes, it's certainly quite expressive, at the cost of complexity - and
Oops, I also meant to point out a screenshot of my mockup:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Stevage_Divided_road.png
(And an earlier version:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/images/archive/9/9e/20091203113817!Stevage_Divided_road.png
)
Sorry for the spam.
Steve
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Stevage_Divided_road.png
If dividers are so small and do not create any turn restrictions, I
just ignore them.
But you are lucky to have a source which allow you to go so deep in
2009/12/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it allows to define things like: there is a kerb between the footway and
the
street, but on given nodes there is a lowered kerb to crossover.
Yes, it's certainly
moved to proposal from user-space to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Mike Collinson wrote:
- Whether friendly or unfriendly, they never have any obligation to merge in
their data improvements into our database.
- However, you or I can.
Does that make sense?
I completely agree that they don't have to do anything towards merging
To be fair, 'village green' has an explicit definition in English law, which is
presumably why whoever originally defined it put the word 'English' in. Agreed,
that it doesn't have to be in a village, but can be in (or, indeed, outside)
any sized population centre.
See
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
That was my interpretation too. It appears to me that if some well-meaning
body released a set of data under the ODbL (which presumably we recommend as
an appropriate licence for geodata) then the OSM project would not be able to
use it. In other
It's both, a rendering issue when the names are duplicated and a
mapping issue about representing the turn restrictions. Note that It's
a very old definition in OSM to say that we duplicate the ways when
there is a physical division between the two ways (it's physically
impossible to cross the
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Mapzen POI Collector was released into the App Store this morning.
Mapzen POI Collector is a free iPhone app that makes it really
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I find the current practice of duplicating minor roads when there is a
median strip pretty unsatisfactory.
I was thinking about this recently when we had the map everything as
areas thread, and I have to agree with you to
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
Agreed, while it's sensible for two ways in a dual carriageway, it seems
OTT to have two ways for a road simply because it's got white lines down
the middle. It seems to me to be introducing unnecessary
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work without using areas, though. And
even then, it'll be complicated. I think the proposal at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road is
far too kludgy and temporary
What do
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work without using areas, though. And
even then, it'll be complicated. I think the proposal at
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
It doesn't seem to be general enough, but instead as an incomplete
lump of special cases.
It covers the small, but salient, case of divided roads. Nothing more.
We're just talking about one key here.
So routers are going to have to
2009/12/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
You shouldn't need to add :area for it to render. :area just means
only use this rule if the way is closed (i.e. start and end points
are the same).
So you might do:
way [highway] [!junction] :area { fill-color: grey; }
which would
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:47, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we should have much
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I should also have asked whether the widths of the roads are
accurately measured. Presumably we need to know the width of each road
and the distance between them, at each point. But if you want to model
the roads that
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention a big problem. Using forward/backward
breaks when a way is reversed. So divider=u_turn_forward and
divider=u_turn_backward are a bad idea.
Steve Bennett wrote:
Why? Primarily as a landmark, I would think. The fact that there is a
median strip is more important, relatively, than that there is a
median strip which is 83cm wide, surfaced in terracotta pavers
overgrown with moss...
Anyway, to back up slightly here, the benefits of
2009/12/3 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 08:47, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
I am glad to inform You that CORINE Land Cover data for Estonia is
currently being imported. It takes some time and some manual or
semi-manual intervention but in few days we
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
And I think that's eventually where we're going. The distance between
the centerlines is only part of the equation, but I wouldn't want to
throw that information away. This is all moot, however, because I now
understand that you
2009/12/3 Anthony o...@inbox.org
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
I think the biggest downside is that it creates two accepted ways to
map the same thing. Even that, I suppose, is not a problem, if we
make it clear that the old way, which contains more information, is
preferable.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/3 Anthony o...@inbox.org
Are there other downsides I'm missing?
I think the biggest downside is that it creates two accepted ways to
map the same thing. Even that, I suppose, is not a problem, if we
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, put it this way: if this was implemented, I would duplicate far
fewer roads in future.
If it worked (and I really haven't delved into the details enough to
check), I might be convinced to add division information
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I don't know. I read over the proposal again and I don't even get it,
actually. Is the way supposed to be split before and after each
intersection?
Maybe I should write up the proposal as I see it, but all I'm proposing is:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, put it this way: if this was implemented, I would duplicate far
fewer roads in future.
If it worked (and I really haven't delved into the details
(Weird, did this email not get sent before - so many emails going back
and forth. Oops.)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
no, I think this is a big con: there are (and will always be) people who
change the map to different schemes, sometimes
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
ie:
|
=+=
|
With junction=fourway or whatever at the +.
fourway would be the only tag that's not ambiguous. Your junction
was already solved properly by turn restrictions.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's take this situation:
B
|
A==C
You're going from A to B. I'm saying that the router doesn't attempt to make
the turn because the way A-C is marked as divided=median, and there's
nothing
2009/12/2 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com
so... do any of us know enough to mark this border on the OSM map?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6712250/Wrong-maps-landed-British-sailors-in-Iranian-captivity.html
http://osm.org/go/zDsi62--
let's ask the different
There have been no comments to the covered proposal since the first
flurry. I'd like to move this to the Approved page if the group has no
objection, so I'll allow another day for comments, and then move it to
voting.
Yes, I know there are those who are dead set against voting, but that's
the
2009/12/2 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de
Hi
as an programmer my first bolean thoughts where
An as a foreign national my thoughts were And I thought OSM was an
international project...
what does not mean you can't use features that appear only in some parts of
the world. I never
Begin forwarded message:
From: paul everett tap...@t-online.de
Date: 3 December 2009 04:57:41 GMT
To: legal-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
First of all, please subscribe to the legal@ mailing list in order to post
questions. Emailing the list owner is awkward.
I am a plugin developer,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 17:10, Margus Värton mar...@dakar.ee wrote:
So my suggestion is to ask from Iceland's local environment agency or
ministry.
Actually I do not see much reason to reject Your proposal.
We've already looked into doing that but every ministry in Iceland has
an explicit
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I'd have mentioned Estonia in the document if I knew about it, I only
mentioned France, including a screenshot of how the attribution is
displayed (requested by the lady...)
In Estonia we have a requirement to tag data mentioning Corine Land
Cover and version of
Hi,
OpenStreetMap mug is amazing! Do you plan to produce it also in bigger size?
I think cca 0.5 l, some one like
http://www.eshop-pro.cz/img/p/5830-8430-thickbox.jpg :-)
Current mug is too small for common every-day use (at least for me) and it's
pity but if bigger mug would be available, I
2009/12/3 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
Unless you want to write routines for pre-processing two almost-parallel
ways back into a single way so it can be rendered neatly, I suggest it's a
mapping problem. Don't make work for other people if you don't have to.
I thought
I've recently been given access to daily per-day GPS dumps for a bunch
of GPS devices. I'd like to produce some statistics from these GPX
files on a daily basis, like how many kilometers each device traveled,
charts per device / group of devices and so forth.
Is there any GPX analysis software
Nick,
Nick Black wrote:
Mapzen POI Collector is a free iPhone app that makes it really easy to
collect POIs for OpenStreetMap. Users locate themselves using the
iPhone's built in GPS, position a pin at the location of the POI they
want to add and then choose from a range of pre-selected
Hello Mappers,
It is Queensland's (Australia) 150th birthday, and to celebrate, the Surveying and Spatial
Sciences Institute (SSSI) organised the placement of a number of commemorative
permanent marks around the state.
http://sssiq150.org/About-SSSI-Q150-Project.aspx
These marks are part
2009/12/4 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Nick,
I assume that the POI collector not only lets you collect new POIs but
also modify existing ones. For this, the existing ones must be shown as
active elements on the map that the device displays. Given that the OSM
server proper is too slow
2009/12/4 nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au:
These marks are part tourist attraction, part survey control. Most are
located where a car with an in-built GPS can drive right up to it, so
the driver can check the accuracy of their GPS signal.
The Gympie co-ords are wonky to say the least, it
2) There is a divided road that has been sketched out roughly, simply
to indicate the division. (Very common, I think) Converting this to a
simple divided=* tag doesn't lose information, and better indicates
the actual level of information stored.
Here's one that looks like 2):
Awesome, nice to finally get some proper criticism :)
I'll write up the proposal as I see it. I think most of these comments are
assuming that somehow a single divider=* tag is going to replace all split
roads, including dual carriageway motorways etc. That's not what I'm
suggesting.
I like the
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Again, this proposal is not primarily about rendering. That's a nice benefit
in some cases. The goals are:
1) More appropriate data structure
How is this more appropriate, you are loosing real world information
to improve rendering.
2) Better
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Again, this proposal is not primarily about rendering. That's a nice
benefit
in some cases. The goals are:
1) More appropriate data structure
How is this more
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
The main focus is *adding* information to roads currently mapped as single
(non-divided) roads. Gaining information. Not losing. There are a huge
number of places that this will add information that was not previously
mapped.
This opens up a can of
Voor mensen die graag oude kaarten mappen:
http://www.historiekaart.nl/
Het zou toch zo mooi zijn als je dit als overlays in OSM had. Ik vind dit soort
kaarten echt geweldig.
Maarten
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Maarten Deen schreef:
Voor mensen die graag oude kaarten mappen:
http://www.historiekaart.nl/
Het zou toch zo mooi zijn als je dit als overlays in OSM had. Ik vind dit
soort
kaarten echt geweldig.
*kuch* verlopen auteursrecht...
-BEGIN
Bedankt voor de tip. Deze kaarten zijn inderdaad super. Je kunt hier super
gaaf zien waar een heleboel van de huidige namen van wijken enzo vandaan
komen, en hoe oud sommige gebouwen al zijn.
Geert.
--
From: Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl
Sent:
Hello Mappers,
It is Queensland's (Australia) 150th birthday, and to celebrate, the Surveying and Spatial
Sciences Institute (SSSI) organised the placement of a number of commemorative
permanent marks around the state.
http://sssiq150.org/About-SSSI-Q150-Project.aspx
These marks are part
I have a question about the suburb boundary ways that have been
imported for Australia a while back.
The boundary ways often follow a road, or the coast, or a stream or
river. Some of the ways are other things, as well as a boundary (a
stream, for example) but some of the boundary ways are
2009/12/4 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
I know this was discussed in a while back. But I lost track of what
the final decision was.
I don't think there was a final decision, some people move the way and
remove the duplicated way, some people use 2 ways.
If a way exists before the import
Hi Nick,
The best tag I could find for this would be:
man_made=survey_point
name=Q150
website=http://sssiq150.org/
ref=Q150
Which is pretty much the same as what you suggested.
Except that the website URL has the http:// bit in it.
I'm not too sure if it'd be a good idea to include the ref tag?
Andreas Pothe schrieb:
Die Turn-Restrictions sind korrekt, ich glaube eher, dass die gar nicht
beachtet werden.
Ja, war ein Bug in mkgmap, der in der v1414 gefixed ist.
Grüße chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Moin !
wie einigen vielleicht schon bekannt habe ich mich einwenig den
Jakobswegen in OSM [1] angenommen und immer wieder ist die Frage
aufgekommen warum werden diese teilweise in den Wanderkarten von OSM
[2], [3] angezeigt und teilweise nicht. Grund für dieses ist die Angabe
in der
Hab mir gerade das Schlußlicht der Tagesschau [1] angesehen. Vgl. auch
Wikipedia [2]. Vielleicht sollten wir bei OSM Argleton eine neue Heimat
geben? ;-)
Gruß
Sven
[1] http://www.tagesschau.de/schlusslicht/argleton104.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argleton
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 04:32:08AM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Sarah Hoffmann lon...@denofr.de writes:
Du musst nicht von dir auf die Allgemeinheit schliessen. In der Schweiz,
wo jedes öffentliche Verkehrsmittel (vom Zug Ìber den Bus bis hin zum
Schiff) einen mehr oder weniger dichten
Zuerst die gute Nachricht:
*Der WDR benutzt OSM* !
In der gestrigen Sendung der Aktuellen Stunde (02.12.2009)
http://www.wdr.de/tv/aks/ war in der 25..27 Minute eine OSM Karte zu sehen.
Jetzt die schlechte:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5602
Ich wollte grad dem WDR eine
Am 3. Dezember 2009 09:23 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
Moin !
wie einigen vielleicht schon bekannt habe ich mich einwenig den
Jakobswegen in OSM [1] angenommen und immer wieder ist die Frage
aufgekommen warum werden diese teilweise in den Wanderkarten von OSM
[2], [3]
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:28:59 +0100
Von: André Reichelt andr...@online.de
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Luftbilder aus Lauf
qbert biker schrieb:
Aber die Rundungen, die ich meine, kann man
Am 3. Dezember 2009 09:49 schrieb Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de:
Zuerst die gute Nachricht:
*Der WDR benutzt OSM* !
In der gestrigen Sendung der Aktuellen Stunde (02.12.2009)
http://www.wdr.de/tv/aks/ war in der 25..27 Minute eine OSM Karte zu sehen.
Gut so. Das freut mich
Jetzt die
Martin Simon schrieb:
Am 3. Dezember 2009 09:23 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
Moin !
Um eine Diskussionsgrundlage zu haben bat ich Flohoff einmal seine
OSM-Datenbank nach den Relationen mit dem Begriff JAKOBSWEG abzufragen
um einmal eine Übersicht der verwendeten
Hallo,
Torsten Breda wrote:
Au weia! Dort existiert also der Abmahnverein! Ich weiss, freies
Projekt usw. aber nützen tut es nicht viel, wenn das Forum die Axt im
Wald schwinkt.
Vor allem so Sprueche wie man sollte XY abmahnen, dann gibts mehr Geld
fuer Server. Erstens mal verdienen an so
Markus schrieb:
PS: ich stecke grad bis zur Halskrause in den Vorbereitungen für die
boot - und habe von Lizenzrecht so gut wie keine Ahnung.
Ach, betreibst du nicht dieses Gemeindeseiten-Beispiel Simmelsdorf? Da
fehlt auch die Lizenz...
Nicht daß mich das stören würde - aber solltest du
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Vor allem so Sprueche wie man sollte XY abmahnen, dann gibts mehr Geld
fuer Server.
Den Edwin bitte nicht so ernst nehmen. Der ist für seine trolligen
Beiträge bekannt.
Chris
___
Talk-de mailing list
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen schrieb:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Vor allem so Sprueche wie man sollte XY abmahnen, dann gibts mehr Geld
fuer Server.
Den Edwin bitte nicht so ernst nehmen. Der ist für seine trolligen
Beiträge bekannt.
...das wissen aber externe nicht und bekommen einen
Ich möchte keine mails mehr erhalten
mfg___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
clbuss schrieb:
Ich möchte keine mails mehr erhalten
Auf http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de kannst du dich aus
der Liste austragen (Unsubscribe or edit options).
Gruß,
olvagor
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
hi !
das habe ich bei forum.openstreetmap.org kund getan:
Moin !
wollen wir uns doch nicht ins Hemd machen und mit denselben Steinen
werfen wie der Mitbewerb
Wir sollte doch über dem ganzen stehen. Vielleicht wäre es angebrachter,
wenn man einen schönen Text aufsetzt den der Finder
Thomas Hog schrieb:
Nicht daß mich das stören würde - aber solltest du wohl besser ändern:
zum einen schreibt dir dann das Forum keine Briefe, zum anderen wird auch
keiner, der das als Vorlage nutzt, mehr oder weniger aufmunternde Briefe
vom Forum erhalten.
Das Forum als solches ist nicht
Zitat Sven Anders:
Hab mir gerade das Schlußlicht der Tagesschau [1] angesehen. Vgl. auch
Wikipedia [2]. Vielleicht sollten wir bei OSM Argleton eine neue Heimat
geben? ;-)
[1] http://www.tagesschau.de/schlusslicht/argleton104.html
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argleton
Unbedingt. Und
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
