Re: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways

For the first two examples there is no doubt that there are still "remains" of a railway, but I still wonder whether it makes much sense to leave the railway tag on this http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.1060394346714&lon=4.379757642745972&zoom=17 especially on the parking area and to a lesser

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Hackathon eGov Wallonia

There is just one letter to change : http://hackathonegovwallonia.net De : Jo À : talk-be Envoyé le : Jeudi 11 avril 2013 11h01 Objet : [OSM-talk-be] Hackathon eGov Wallonia Salut, I received a business card from somebody about a Hackathon 4, 5 and 6 Oct

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways

No, highway and cycleway should not share any ways. The only thing which may be acceptable is reusing the same nodes for two different ways, but only if they are on exactly the same location, which is actually quite rare. In quite a lot of cases there will be an offset, or it will diverge a little

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways

This means that the separate track should be removed for the 3 cases I listed, or not ? On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:31 PM, André Pirard wrote: > On 2013-04-13 23:02, Marc Gemis wrote : > > ... > > So why two lines for an abandoned railway and the cycleway/footway on it ? > Can't they be combined

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Abandoned Railways / cycleways

On 2013-04-13 23:02, Marc Gemis wrote : ... So why two lines for an abandoned railway and the cycleway/footway on it ? Can't they be combined ? What to do is explained in the OSM wiki at ... Railways Abandoned - The track has been removed and the