Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Routes

2017-02-15 Thread joost schouppe
Hi Bart, This is also why we have the UMAPs. The idea is to mark bigger differences like that, and talk to the provincial GR responsibles about them. Without some curation like that, we'll never know who is really right, because the same often happens the other way around too. Check the GR12 umap

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Routes

2017-02-15 Thread Bart Vanherck
Thanks for the links I will have a better look at it. I do not really trust the official gpx files. For example: the route in Geel is different because the route has been changed a few years ago, but the official gpx trace is still the old one. So I think we still need to verify it on terrain.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Routes

2017-02-14 Thread joost schouppe
Hi Bart, Is it the Aanlooproute that was deleted, or one of it's member paths? If it is the first, Jo's explanation above won't help you I'm afraid. I do have some good (or bad, depending on how you look at it) new though. We are allowed to use the GPX files from Grote Routepaden to map these

Re: [OSM-talk-be] GR Routes

2017-02-14 Thread Jo
Hi Bart, First off, you can upload your GPX traces before deleting them locally. If you know in which changeset the path was deleted, you can use the reverter plugint of JOSM to restore the path. You can also use the first version of Potlatch, but it can only restore ways: Go to where you know

[OSM-talk-be] GR Routes

2017-02-14 Thread Bart Vanherck
Hi all, I noticed that a path that I mapped is disappeared. Can I somewhere see who deleted that path? Or maybe it was a script that did this? The latter I think not, because the GR route I was mapping is still at the point where I left it. And if I have that changeset or so, can I easily revert