Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-02 Thread Karel Adams
Thanks Jo, that brought a smile! The crux of the matter is of course that I can NOT fly into it, it being so private as to be almost secretive. In fact I am wondering more and more why these guys so vehemently refuse to give this airstrip a name, it really feels like something is being hushed

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-02 Thread Karel Adams
OK Marc, thanks. Since @SomeoneElse is in the DWG, I suppose his advice was as much arbitration as I can ask for. On 02/04/18 05:57, Marc Gemis wrote: Did you contact the owner of the airfield to find out how they name it ? Did you find a sign along the street pointing to the airfield with a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-02 Thread Jo
Karel, you are going to have to fly over to that airstrip and put up a large sign next to it . Photograph it and hope it catches on among the local population... (That's how I read Frederik Ramms comment) I didn't look at the changeset. We have a description tag, if it's a description and not a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-01 Thread Marc Gemis
Did you contact the owner of the airfield to find out how they name it ? Did you find a sign along the street pointing to the airfield with a name ? Is there a name sign at the entrance ? Is there an official document from a government which mentions a name ? If all of those questions return

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-01 Thread Pieter Vander Vennet
Hey Karel, This is the Belgian mailing list. Why send us, espacially about an aerodome in Denmark? Please ask the Data Working Group. We are not qualified for arbitration. Met vriendelijke groeten, Pieter Vander Vennet 2018-04-01 23:08 GMT+02:00 Karel Adams : > I am in a

[OSM-talk-be] How to request arbitration?

2018-04-01 Thread Karel Adams
I am in a bitter dispute with a couple of mappers who absolutely refuse to accept a "name=*" tag on an aerodrome because officially it has no name - indeed it figures in no official document. My point of view is that an "invented" name - which can be discussed, of course - is better than no