Re: [OSM-talk-be] Speed pedelec

2017-07-22 Thread Jakka
irculation plan" in Ghent. The consensus was to use moped_P like Ben suggests below. See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qx4 Seppe -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Ben Laenen [mailto:benlae...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 21 juli 2017 13:44 Aan: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-ta

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Speed pedelec

2017-07-21 Thread Santens Seppe
lto:benlae...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 21 juli 2017 13:44 Aan: talk-be@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Speed pedelec On Friday, 21 July 2017 13:34:12 CEST Jakka wrote: > Question on osm.org note: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1072935#map=18/51.15817/4.50524 >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Speed pedelec

2017-07-21 Thread Ben Laenen
On Friday, 21 July 2017 13:34:12 CEST Jakka wrote: > Question on osm.org note: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1072935#map=18/51.15817/4.50524=N > > How tag interdiction of speed pedelec ? We're already using moped_A and moped_B in Belgium, we can easily introduce moped_P since they're