Google Docs seems to be a little fuzzy right now, so here's the link to the
latest version.
http://sites.google.com/a/acrosscanadatrails.com/www/Home/geobaseNHN2osm0_02.zip
The Java files are included in the lib directory (i didn't create them)
but are available. Ian Dees was the one who put it
Thanks,
Good call. :-)
The point feature building=yes otherwise known as
point,CODE,2010010,canvec:CODE,2010010
point,CODE,2010010,building,yes
What it does is show up as a little house icon with JOSM
for the polygons, they show up as nice shapes.. and when clicked on would
simply state this
oops,
point,CODE,2010250,canvec:CODE,2010250
point,CODE,2010250,building,yes
Indicating building=other would also be omited, fixing up the script and
the wiki now, to see how it likes it.
Sam
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks,
Good
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 16:25 -0400, Mepham, Michael wrote:
At the last GeoBase Steering Committee meeting we discussed ideas on
how GeoBase and Open StreetMap could work together to each others
advantage. We believe that each group has its strengths and that by
supporting each other we can
On 22 Mar 2009 at 12:02 Steve Singer ssinger...@sympatico.ca wrote
about Re: [Talk-ca] Address ranges[...]
Part of me prefers a scheme that adds address tags directly to the nodes
that make up the road.
The downside of that is[...]
Another downside is that it doesn't reflect reality (or,
2009/3/23 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Good call. :-)
The point feature building=yes otherwise known as
point,CODE,2010010,canvec:CODE,2010010
point,CODE,2010010,building,yes
What it does is show up as a little house icon with JOSM
for the polygons, they show up
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 20:05 -0400, Michel Gilbert wrote:
2009/3/23 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com
I have not yet received the answer from NRCan about if the
location of the node is EXACTLY where the building actually
is, or is it just shown in the
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 19:55 -0400, Bob Jonkman wrote:
On 22 Mar 2009 at 12:02 Steve Singer ssinger...@sympatico.ca wrote
about Re: [Talk-ca] Address ranges[...]
Part of me prefers a scheme that adds address tags directly to the nodes
that make up the road.
The downside of that is[...]
Cool, i put the 'building=yes' back in service for both the 'unknown'
and 'other' feature point types.
Good thing too; as i had a challenge trying to get the 'exclusion
script' to work.
And yup, i'll subscribe to that talk list (i'll try to keep quiet on
that one) :-)
cheers,
Sam
On 3/23/09,
Cool, i put the 'building=yes' back in service for both the 'unknown'
and 'other' feature point types.
Good thing too; as i had a challenge trying to get the 'exclusion
script' to work.
And yup, i'll subscribe to that talk list (i'll try to keep quiet on
that one) :-)
cheers,
Sam
On 3/23/09,
10 matches
Mail list logo