On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 04:39 -0500, Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 01:54:12 -0500
Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Nicholas Vetrovec
nickvet...@yahoo.comwrote:
Posted on the US Page to help coordinate US Interstate relations.
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 10:38 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
network=us_i_2 # Interstate (2 digit) us_i_3 for 3 digit
network=us_us_2 # US Route us_us_3 for 3 digit
network=us_ny # NY State Route
network=us_ny_county #
That looks great to me, except that us_i_2 vs us_i_3 seems like tagging
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:23 -0500, Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:39:45 -0700
Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
2 relations are easier. adding role to thousands of members is a
pain. and we need to split relations with API 0.6 anyway
So how do we handle the
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 20:26 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Why make this more complicated than it has to be? Leave the names on
the underlying way, not the relations; leave the refs on the relations,
not the underlying ways. Then it's a matter of
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 16:55 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
It contains all you need to pick the correct sign. But you need the
whole knowledge about signs for all states, county ...
as an example California uses different signs for US routes but the
same for
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 12 Apr 2009, at 9:01 , Adam Schreiber wrote:
Probably because the mapper can easily identify the type of road (i.e.
Interstate, US Hwy, etc.). I'm not sure that the mapper should be
specifying the URL of the sign since it requires extra work to find it
and any
Hi,
im wondering if you have included the ferry routes as part of your script?
Thanks,
Sam
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
7 matches
Mail list logo
