Re: [Talk-ca] canvec mep feature 1150012 10- Coastal w ater - (Eau côtière) = Ocean - ( Océa n )

Hi, Concerning Intermittent water, how could we make sure to have it rendered through mapnik and osmarender? Daniel Concerning Osm, there is no water level definition for the moment but there is a proposed feature that match perfectly (*)!

Re: [Talk-ca] canvec mep feature 1150012 10- Coastal w ater - (Eau côtière) = Ocean - ( Océa n )

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Bégin, Daniel daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote: Hi, Concerning Intermittent water, how could we make sure to have it  rendered through mapnik and osmarender? Dear Daniel, This question appears in IRC and the talk list every once in a while. The short

Re: [Talk-ca] canvec mep feature 1150012 10- Coastal w ater - (Eau côtière) = Ocean - ( Océa n )

Thanks Richard.. i think i'll start mapping Flying Rhinocerosesses... as soon as i see them :@) Anyway, Regarding all of the 317 map features that need to be tagged 'correctly'. The only way i know how todo that is just by simple ...usage. When the .osm files become available and people start

[Talk-ca] Tiger positioning not quite correct?

Working on NRN import on BC/Alaska border, in the town of Stewart, and it looks like there is a mismatch in positions between TIGER and NRN. Take a look at Highway 37A as it crosses the border in [1]. See that there is no road to connect to in Alaska. Now take a look at how Google maps has it in

Re: [Talk-ca] Tiger positioning not quite correct?

usually tiger is wrong, yahoo resolution is not very good but still good enough to confirm that the tiger roads don't match at all. On 19 Feb 2010, at 19:26 , Adam Dunn wrote: Working on NRN import on BC/Alaska border, in the town of Stewart, and it looks like there is a mismatch in