CanVec was what I aligned to. That and local knowledge - I know parts of UBC
extremely well, having been there for about 7-8 years.
If the Vancouver license isn't compatible with OSM the wiki should be edited
- it says it's acceptable as is.
-Original Message-
From: samvekem...@gmail.com
were still waiting for OpenStreetMap to change it's licence :)
lol...
but anyway, geocommons.com is a good temporary home for the p files :)
and having the data on standby just waiting to use used is helpfull.
cheers,
sam
On 10/31/10, john whelan wrote:
> I was under the impression that th
I was under the impression that the City of Vancouver "Open" data along with
Ottawa's and Calgary's wasn't quite open enough for OSM use. I assume you
aligned with CANVEC data and merely visually confirmed it against
Vancouver's data?
I understand they were looking at changing the license, if you
3 matches
Mail list logo