On 9/12/2011 6:32 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
Just brain-storming, so let's have suggestions without debate for now.
What should the OSM data look like when styled for Canadians?
I like the suggestions so far. I'd add
- First Nations borders
- Crown land boundries
- special rendering for
On 12/05/2010 10:13 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
Are there bilingual road signs in Ottawa?
Yes. For example:
http://bit.ly/9Y8JDn *
This can lead to humourous situations when anglos like myself are
absentminded. Shortly after moving to Ottawa, when driving around
looking for a particular
Sam's message has me somewhat confused as to who said what. In terms of
cycling tagging in North America, where the legal framework is fairly
similar* most places, my approach has been as follows, FWIW. First of
all, it gets confusing quickly because we don't have much in the way of
John Whelan wrote:
Basically the map in Ottawa is unreliable but we don't know where.
There seems to be no way of knowing whether a road has been mapped by
GPS trace or sketched in by hand.
If I understand the process correctly, to do an import from Geobase you
would need to use a script
Hi everyone,
I was cleaning up some areas where the TCT shares its path with roads
and other existing trails (here http://osm.org/go/ZXnePd73--, if you are
interested).
It appears that there used to be a relation, which was part of a mass
deletion recently
rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Adam Glauser adamglau...@gmail.com wrote:
I was cleaning up some areas where the TCT shares its path with roads
and other existing trails (here http://osm.org/go/ZXnePd73--, if you are
interested).
It appears that there used
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Adam Glauseradamglau...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found (and since corrected) a couple more false-positive matches.
It seems Potlatch doesn't like it when you take a long time to save
changes. I've now _actually_ made the corrections.
Way 35502496 was name=Willow
I've found (and since corrected) a couple more false-positive matches.
Ways 35518380 was name=Old Oak Place, statscan:rbuid=3357619. These
tags should actually have been applied to way 35521248. The correct
tags for the first way are name=Aspenwood Place, statscan:rbuid=3357613.
Way 35502496
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Adam Glauser wrote:
I've found a way[1], which appears to have come in with this import,
but is incorrectly named. I checked out the Geobase website and found
their viewing tool[2], but I can't see the names
I've found a way[1], which appears to have come in with this import,
but is incorrectly named. I checked out the Geobase website and found
their viewing tool[2], but I can't see the names for the NRN ways.
How can I check whether this is, in fact, an error in the NRN data?
Secondly, when I fix
10 matches
Mail list logo
