I've been talking to Ottawa's CIO and he understands the licensing
concerns. Apparently they are thinking of changing it but what would be
useful is a internal OSM consensus on whether ODbL or PDDL is best. I
understand that new people who sign up to OSM are being asked to release
under ODbL.
Th
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:15 PM, john whelan wrote:
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2010/05/12/ottawa-open-data.html
>
> It will probably take some time before we can digest it but it looks like it
> should be available soon.
That's good news that Ottawa is open to Open. Thanks for bring
As I said it will take time to digest.
Thanks John
On 12 May 2010 14:25, Thomas Cort wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are some data sets up now (SHP files for parks and rec). Though
> the license doesn't appear to be compatible with OSM. I've written up
> my concerns about the terms of use here:
> htt
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2010/05/12/ottawa-open-data.html
It will probably take some time before we can digest it but it looks like it
should be available soon.
Cheerio John
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.op
4 matches
Mail list logo