Bonjour,
I'm working on the Canvec.osm - release 10 - conversion process and I'd like to
double check an answer I got from Paul concerning administrative boundaries.
Release 10 will contain up to three administrative boundary types where
available ...
- Regional
- Upper Municipality
-
I've notice a few ways in OSM like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39334713
that really shouldn't be in the database. They're GeoBase imports via
the NRN. They're not tagged in any way that would allow removal.
There is no public access on these roads. They're mostly gated
If they physically exist, we should tag them. Just add a gate=yes tag to them.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Stewart C. Russell scr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've notice a few ways in OSM like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39334713
that really shouldn't be in the database.
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:22 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Wind farm access roads that really shouldn't be in
OSM
I've notice a few ways in OSM like this one:
On 12-03-19 19:45 , Paul Norman wrote:
I'd just retag as highway=service, but it
definitely belongs in the DB if there's a road or path there, just not
tagged like it is.
But it's not a highway, which implies access. There is no access.
The particular one I tagged, given the amount of
OSM makes no judgements about what we are mapping (beyond a few unavoidable
basics). Not mapping something because the police are going to get you is
on the face ridiculous. So map, add a note about it being private and add
that gate.
On Mar 19, 2012 5:07 PM, Stewart C. Russell scr...@gmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Stewart C. Russell [mailto:scr...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Wind farm access roads that really shouldn't be
in OSM
On 12-03-19 19:45 , Paul Norman wrote:
I'd just retag as highway=service, but it definitely belongs in the DB
if there's a road
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Stewart C. Russell scr...@gmail.com wrote:
But it's not a highway, which implies access. There is no access.
The generic use of the word highway implies public access, but in OSM
parlance, the term highway is used as a key, and the value assigned
indicates the
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
highway=service with access=no or access=private then. Many service roads
aren't open to the public.
If the road is there and is a service road, it's mappable.
I'd like to add, though, that there is a problem with
The wiki values seems consistent for Quebec and I think that we can avoid to
restart this discussion again.
Pierre Béland
De : Bégin, Daniel daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca
Envoyé le : Lundi 19 mars 2012 14h34
In Openstreetmap wiki, the admin_level were
10 matches
Mail list logo
