Re: [Talk-ca] Federal licence : Confusion

2015-10-11 Thread john whelan
The agreement between CANVEC and OSM was drawn up before the .odbl license and change to the uploading procedure which says any data uploaded to OSM can have its license changed. I'm of the opinion that the CANVEC licensed data cannot now be imported into OSM under the new conditions however

Re: [Talk-ca] Federal licence : Confusion

2015-10-11 Thread john whelan
> I thought I read on this list in the past that OSM had permission directly from NRCan to use the CanVec data. That permission was given before the change of license and upload clause. Cheerio John On 11 October 2015 at 20:19, Bernie Connors wrote: > I thought I

Re: [Talk-ca] Federal licence : Confusion

2015-10-11 Thread Bernie Connors
I thought I read on this list in the past that OSM had permission directly from NRCan to use the CanVec data. Bernie. BTW, the GeoNB Open Data Licence in New Brunswick is more permissive with its attribution

Re: [Talk-ca] Federal licence : Confusion

2015-10-11 Thread Bruno Remy
Those kind of attribution terms are (imo) too conservative considering that they can be applicable for old-school "spreadsheets-like" datawiz , but can't definitively not be applicable to geospatial data. How do you manage the crowdsourcing of data in a single place, while zooming in and out?