Thank you, Daniel, for advancing on the import! I agree with most of
what you said below (I will reply to some details on the wiki page).
I also agree to separate the different sources as I have great
reservations about using Microsoft's building footprints for an import
into OSM (the
Sounds sane to me.
Thanks John
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 16:05, Daniel @jfd553 wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> To comply with the import directive, I would like the discussion to
> continue on the current ODB import only. Could we talk about other sources
> of potential imports at another time? -)
>
>
>
>
That is why I proposed changes in some wiki page (talk), to deal with many
imports, without mixing discussions :-)
Daniel
From: Daniel @jfd553 [mailto:jfd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 16:06
To: john whelan; Daniel @jfd553
Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca]
Hi John,
To comply with the import directive, I would like the discussion to continue on
the current ODB import only. Could we talk about other sources of potential
imports at another time? -)
Thanks
Daniel
From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 15:57
Sounds sane to me.
Are we thinking of setting up a second import to handle Microsoft building
outlines on a similar basis? Or extending this one? I only ask since if we
are doing it municipality by municipality it might be an idea to identify
those municipalities that do not have suitable open
Bonjour groupe, mes excuses pour ce très long courriel !-)
I have reviewed everything that has been written on the ODB import (aka Canada
Building Import) in Talk-ca and the wiki. I proposed changes to some wiki pages
(via talk tabs) to ease the discussions about this import and the following.
6 matches
Mail list logo
