Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

2018-02-20 Thread Matthew Darwin
Maybe the wiki needs updating, because it doesn't align with this discussion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines Street names Many Canadian cities and towns use the grid based structure, the presence of numbered streets and avenues is very common. /Sugge

Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

2018-02-20 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2018-02-20 01:15 PM, Viajero Perdido wrote: > > But if that changes it so it's no longer "the name", logically that rule > doesn't apply. It seems that in the US cities in OSM that I've looked at, mappers have been fairly (but not completely) consistent in using full quadrant names: Northeast,

Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

2018-02-20 Thread Viajero Perdido
On 18-02-20 10:51 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: "If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it." But if that changes it so it's no longer "the name", logically that rule doesn't apply. The name of my street ends in "NW".  Changing it to end in "Northwest" or "North

Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

2018-02-20 Thread Clifford Snow
Here is what the wiki [1] has to say on the subject of names; If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way (St. could be Street or Saint). If the signs have abbreviated words and you don't know what the full

Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

2018-02-20 Thread Viajero Perdido
I continue to assert that our (OSM's) name=* wiki states these abbreviations should be fully expanded and that official_name=* might hold the abbreviation. Hi Everyone. I'll pop in here because I'd hate to see this considered "discussed and approved". (And replying a day late because I'm st