[Talk-ca] Import Canvec : micro-tâches / Canvec imports micro-tasking

Voir discussion en français / See English discussion below   Paul Norman,sat. november 2012 6h37   Subject :  Internal CanVec conflicts Is it the communities view that it is okay to import CanVec without reconciling the internal differences between the layers? My view is that importing data

Re: [Talk-ca] Import Canvec : micro-tâches / Canvec imports micro-tasking

Hi Pierre, I'm glad to see you're taking a constructive approach towards the discussion initiated by Paul :) I definitely agree something needs to be done to make imports more manageable, especially the Canvec import. There is also an amount of work left behind as I mentioned in my other

Re: [Talk-ca] Import Canvec : micro-tâches / Canvec imports micro-tasking

Frank Steggink  november 13 2012 16h13 Apart from the inconsistencies, there is for example also the Geobase import. In 2009 the available Geobase data didn't contain road names in Québec, and by then it was also not clear when it would contain names. So there are many areas which have roads

Re: [Talk-ca] Import Canvec : micro-tâches / Canvec imports micro-tasking

I have wondered about setting up a snapshot-server and loading CanVec on it then setting up a P2 deployment pointing at it. The problem with splitting by layers is that OSM data is not divided by layers (including planet files). In general if you have interdependent layers and you want to use