On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Richard
I dont think that we should advocate against import.
Then we differ.
I've been advocating for better imports with every import I've seen
since 2006. While the tools have improved, the results for the most
part,
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] OSM New-York - Import de contours de batiments et adresses
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Richard
I dont think that we should advocate against import.
Then we differ.
I've been advocating for better imports with every import I've
2014 12h49
*Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] OSM New-York - Import de contours de batiments et
adresses
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Richard
I dont think that we should advocate against import.
Then we differ.
I've been advocating for better imports
obvious for you :-)
Best,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: January-06-14 12:49
To: Pierre Béland
Cc: diane.merc...@gmail.com; Talk- CA Open Street Map
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] OSM New-York - Import de contours de batiments et
adresses
On Mon
Bonne année à tous,
Je découvre cette note parlant de OSM-US et de l'import du bati et des adresses
de New-York.
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/nyc-and-openstreetmap-cooperating-through-open-data/
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20418
Voici une zone où l'import a été effectué.
I would point to the NYC building import as another example of how
imports can go badly, and be damaging for OpenStreetMap. To be
beneficial, any import must be handled with extreme care. NYC has not
done that. You'll have to read a very long thread to understand what
is going on, from those who
6 matches
Mail list logo
