Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-30 Thread Richard Weait
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:19 PM, john whelan wrote: >> My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used >> by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage >> buildings etc. > You have an opportunity

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread Andrew MacKinnon
> Wholesale deletion of the work of many volunteers without their > consent seems even less likely to generate a positive outcome.  I > would consider that wholesale deletion to be vandalism. I strongly agree. Manually edited data should never be removed and replaced automatically with a data impo

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:19 PM, john whelan wrote: > My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used > by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage > buildings etc. Super. You have groups of interested people, motivated and equipped? Then your mappi

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread Gerald A
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:36 PM, John Whelan wrote: > Basically the map in Ottawa is unreliable but we don't know where. There > seems to be no way of knowing whether a road has been mapped by GPS trace or > sketched in by hand. > Any map can be unreliable, and often providers of such maps don

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread James Ewen
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:36 AM, John Whelan wrote: > Let's recap, I've seen no substantiation for the statement that thousands of > hours of work will be lost. We've seen no substantiation that all of Ottawa is a bunch of garbage. I'm not sure how you can believe that all of the work done so f

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:53:45PM -0400, Adam Glauser wrote: > John Whelan wrote: > > Basically the map in Ottawa is unreliable but we don't know where. > > There seems to be no way of knowing whether a road has been mapped by > > GPS trace or sketched in by hand. > > If I understand the proce

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread Adam Glauser
John Whelan wrote: > Basically the map in Ottawa is unreliable but we don't know where. > There seems to be no way of knowing whether a road has been mapped by > GPS trace or sketched in by hand. If I understand the process correctly, to do an import from Geobase you would need to use a script

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread John Whelan
Let's recap, I've seen no substantiation for the statement that thousands of hours of work will be lost.  I've seen nothing from any one else who has done any GPS traces in Ottawa.  I've seen two different places where the existing OSM map is 100 meters out from a GPS measurement. Basically th

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread James Ewen
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Gerald A wrote: > I think Sam was hinting at "wholesale deletion and replacement", rather then > "editing permission". That's the problem, hinting at an idea is not an accurate statement. Sam (and others) have made a number of generic statements, when they are ta

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-29 Thread Gerald A
Hi John, On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:19 PM, john whelan wrote: > My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used > by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage > buildings etc. So, if I'm understanding what you say above and in previous e-mails, you

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread Richard Degelder
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:19 PM, john whelan wrote: > My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used > by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage > buildings etc. If you are saying that provided I can do a couple of > GPS traces down some of the c

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:45 PM, James Ewen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sam Vekemans > wrote: > > > Provided that you have direct permission from the person who origionally > > traced those roads to change them over. Then it's fine to swap those OSM > > roads, to add in geob

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread James Ewen
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:19 PM, john whelan wrote: > My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used > by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage > buildings etc. Leverage those people with geographic interests... If they go out to tag a tree, and

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread James Ewen
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote: > Provided that you have direct permission from the person who origionally > traced those roads to change them over.  Then it's fine to swap those OSM > roads, to add in geobase roads.   (But the whole point of our discussions is > that we need

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread john whelan
My objective at the moment is to get something sane that can be used by various groups in the city with GPS devices to tag trees, heritage buildings etc. If you are saying that provided I can do a couple of GPS traces down some of the city center roads then based on that we can adjust the road sys

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi James, i know you sent it to Richard, but i'll chime in :-) On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:13 PM, James A. Treacy wrote: > Richard, > A mapper notices a subdivision in openstreetmap does not jibe with > his experience so he goes and traces it using his gps. He loads it > into JOSM along with the

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread James A. Treacy
Richard, A mapper notices a subdivision in openstreetmap does not jibe with his experience so he goes and traces it using his gps. He loads it into JOSM along with the current openstreetmap data and the geobase streets. He then notices that the existing data is worse than he thought: streets aren't

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-28 Thread Richard Degelder
Ladies and Gentlemen, James Treacy mentioned On the other hand, there are many areas that have had the occasional, inexperienced mapper enter a few roads. These are generally of low quality and make a mess of the geobase import. These people are not on talk-ca so never had a chance to say, 'repla

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-27 Thread James Ewen
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, James A. Treacy wrote: > In spite of the second case, anyone asking about poor quality roads is > given the party line that the existing work should stay. > > This is ridiculous. I think you're misinterpreting the statements being made... this is kind of like th

Re: [Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-27 Thread James A. Treacy
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:22:00PM -0400, john whelan wrote: > Is there any way to get some consensus amongst OSM mappers in Ottawa > to start clean again with just Geobase data? How does one locate them > or make a reasonable effort to locate them? Or to reassure me that > most of Ottawa is base

[Talk-ca] Users in Ottawa and Geobase

2009-10-27 Thread john whelan
As far as I can see there are three of us in Ottawa. One hasn't done anything for a couple of years, one started in July 2009, I've started very recently. I don't think there is a mass of GPS tracks on which the maps are built. In two sample areas I've seen major discrepancies between my Garmin