On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
But generally the question is should oneway to cars be tagged as
oneway=yes? Because it paints a big oneway arrow on the map which
will confuse everyone except car-drivers.
Even if you're a cyclist or other user
On 24/09/2008 09:56, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
whether you can just cycle the wrong way down
the road avoiding any on coming cars.
I _think_ that is illegal in the UK anyway isn't it?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Ed Loach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy wrote:
Actually they aren't - what they are doing is making one end of
the
road no access to motorised vehicles. So the road itself is no
longer
technically oneway, so it shouldn't need cycleway=opposite...
So
Not particularly relevant to current discussion, but I came a cross a
new variant of the anti-rat-run measures when mapping a new estate in
Chepstow at weekend. Two halves of the estate were separated by a road
closed to cars, but with cycle/foot access. The blocker was a lowerable
pole with
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/09/2008 09:56, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
whether you can just cycle the wrong way down
the road avoiding any on
On 24/09/2008 11:46, Dave Stubbs wrote:
cycleway=opposite_lane you mean?
Yes, sorry.
Or we start a guerilla campaign to fix the tagging at source... a few
fake oneway signs, a hammer, and some cable ties should do the trick.
Now there's an interesting thought: instead of changing the map to
Andy Allan wrote:
Doesn't seem to stop people arguing about it on the wiki, but every
single time someone has claimed that there are cycleway=opposite in
the UK it's never (AFAIK) actually held up to scrutiny.
I think Union Street in Southwark:
7 matches
Mail list logo
