On 17 Dec 2008, at 22:03, Steve Chilton wrote:
Bizarely, the day Kaerest released his openrailmap I had rendered a
UK rail network map - purely for visualisation and checking
purposes, but have only just had time to upload it to the server.
It is at:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:52, Peter Miller wrote:
Could these maps render the 'lanes' tag, around which there seems to
be an emerging consensus for showing the number of tracks, typically
1 for single track working, 2 and the 4. The rendering should use a
different style for single track working
Proposed projects are something I'm keen to see mapped. Once a feature
reaches the planning application stage I think we should be prepared to
document it. The principal issue with this is of course that most planning
applications go hand in hand with an OS derived map/plan. Thus representing
the
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:12, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:52, Peter Miller wrote:
Could these maps render the 'lanes' tag, around which there seems to
be an emerging consensus for showing the number of tracks, typically
1 for single track working, 2 and the 4. The rendering
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:12, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
For features with a previous use (eg abandoned stations) I have more
of as
problem at this juncture of the project. At some point I'd really
like to be
able to record some historical map data but I don't feel we have the
Peter Miller wrote:
Sent: 18 December 2008 11:55 AM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: 'Peter Miller'; 'Steve Chilton'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Yet another rail network map
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:12, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
For features with a
2008/12/18 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com:
But where a footpath or other
feature makes use of the original feature then I would definitely add a tag
that explains the features former use, that's useful data.
I hadn't thought of it before, but that sounds like a good
For the record, at the moment the mapnik layer does not render
railway=dismantled.
It does render railway=abandoned or =disused but ONLY if there is NO
associated highway tag.
Thus abandoned railway turned into a cycleway will show as the latter,
but will show as abandoned railway where it is not,
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
For features with a previous use (eg abandoned stations) I have more of as
problem at this juncture of the project. At some point I'd really like to be
able to record some historical map data but I don't feel we have the tools
and editing visualisation
Hi,
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Is the idea of a separate, railways-only dataset too far fetched?
I'd rather have a separate historic objects dataset or so, as there
are many other historic places people would like to map but which would
pollute the main map. Big difficulty is that past and
a new list for The North region
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-thenorth
We'll be having the first regional social get together with tea, cake
and/or beer which I've pencilled in for Sunday 25th January in a
location somewhere in Leeds, West Yorkshire
Sign up to the list, and
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Tim Waters (chippy)
chippy2...@gmail.com wrote:
(the term The North is intentionally vague, I guess it's mainly
aimed at North England, but if you think you are in the north, then
you are! :-)
Apparently people at +55 degrees latitude haven't reached it yet:
oy - less of the 'his' please!
I'm planning on developing mine further in the new year, largely for
personal learning, but I'd love a copy of the mapnik template you used
for you version - I may 'borrow' some server time over christmas to
re-render to as high a level zoom as I can.
I'm also
13 matches
Mail list logo
