I was out and about at the weekend when I came across this[0] sign for a
cycle route and I'm not quite sure how to tag it. I was under the
impression that national routes had red backgrounds and regional/local
routes had blue but it seems to be a rather large number for a national
route.
Can
Don't worry. There are a number of three-digit national routes appearing
now. That doesn't mean that there are at least 246 national routes. It's
just that the numbers have a little significance in the scheme of things,
like they do with road numbers.
So, in short, it's NCN.
-Original
Hi Andy,
You were in the same place as me this weekend more or less!!! I recognise that.
I walked from Andover to Winchester on Sunday afternoon and walked a small
section of this cycle track near the Mayfly at Fullerton. You weren't in the
area then?
I'd just suggest ncn_ref=246. I think,
It looks like 3 digit NCN national route references are replacing the
two-digit, per-region NCN regional routes.
From
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/what-we-do/national-cycle-network/route-numbering-system
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/what-we-do/national-cycle-network/route-numbering-system
For the
Hi
Near where I live there's a small stretch (about 100m) of the roadside
verge that has signs on it saying that it's a Site of Special
Scientific Interest.
It's only on one side of the road, and is about 0.5m wide for most of
its length, widening to about 2m near one end. Looking in the Wiki
On 30/06/2010 16:01, Glenn Proctor wrote:
Hi
Near where I live there's a small stretch (about 100m) of the roadside
verge that has signs on it saying that it's a Site of Special
Scientific Interest.
It's only on one side of the road, and is about 0.5m wide for most of
its length, widening to
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
(when to use footway or path)
I use footway for surfaced paths and path for unsurfaced,
This is, IMO, incorrect usage. the primary tag should be used to declare
it's legal status (am I allowed down to go down that path) secondary
tags such as 'surface' the
Clear as mud. I think what you are saying is that it is a regional
route, and should therefore be an rcn, but that it will be
nationally distinctive number, so you could call it an ncn.
I'd probably call it an ncn, since the distinction between regional
and national routes is a bit arbitrary, and
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged with
ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes all the new three-figure
routes.
White-on-blue are Regional Routes. These are being
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen
over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged
with ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes
On 30 Jun 2010, at 19:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And just to confuse matters, Oxford has it's own local numbering (1-9
on blue backgrounds).
Yep. Several places have local networks (we tag them with lcn_ref) and it is
*really* confusing when they use blue
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 07:12 -0700, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Hi Andy,
You were in the same place as me this weekend more or less!!! I
recognise that.
I walked from Andover to Winchester on Sunday afternoon and walked a
small section of this cycle track near the Mayfly at Fullerton. You
12 matches
Mail list logo
