On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 10:26 +0000, Dave F. wrote: > On 08/02/2011 16:54, Andy Street wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 10:40 +0000, Bob Kerr wrote: > >> I am presently doing some tracing in Dumfries and there is a way which > >> is marked public_transport=pay_scale_area. It is part of a Naptan > >> import. The area seems to be vague and is cutting across a number of > >> areas where I am doing some detailed work. > >> > >> Is there a good reason that this should still be kept? > >> > > I've got a similar problem with ways showing the extent of hi-res Yahoo! > > imagery (tagged boundary=yahoo, area=yes). I can't see any real use for > > having this data in the database and if we were to do the same for other > > imagery sources then it'd soon become a right old mess. > > > > Any objections before I hit delete? > > Yes, possibly. > > As has been posted before, this is useful while editing at a high zoom > factor to know where you can change background, especially when mapping > long linear ways such as rivers. This may have been superseded by Bing, > but I'm not sure if UK coverage of it is fully high-res (zoom 21).
Okay, seeing as this is still in use I wont delete it. What I have done on the way near me is remove the area=yes tag. I think that this can be inferred from boundary=yahoo anyway and it stops JOSM from painting a background colour over huge areas of map. Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb