On 8 April 2011 18:49, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2011 17:27, David Fitzhugh wrote:
I am seeking some clarification about the figures presented in the table.
Where a road,street,highway, lane etc is deemed to be missing, is it missing
altogether or plotted but just
On 8 April 2011 23:31, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 08/04/2011 17:25, Ed Avis wrote:
I've documented it in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_and_OSL_differences_analysis
Ta
Could you give em an example please?
Yes, if was simply that it should have been highway=no
On 6 April 2011 16:53, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Richard wrote:
I'd put the number for cars (ie 70mph for a dual carriageway), and
the source if it's not the number that's on the sign.
This is similar to what I've done. For areas where a national speed
limit applies I have used
On 9 April 2011 08:15, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 6 April 2011 16:53, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Richard wrote:
I'd put the number for cars (ie 70mph for a dual carriageway), and
the source if it's not the number that's on the sign.
This is similar to what
On 09/04/2011 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
maxspeed:type=GB:dual_carriageway (or GB:motorway, GB:rural, GB:urban)
I don't like the urban/rural dichotomy for the UK as it doesn't
correspond to anything in the legislation here - unless you believe that
street-lighting is a specifically urban
Here are some examples of not:name and highway=no:
http://oscompare.raggedred.net/?zoom=14lat=51.54846lon=-0.21501layers=B0TF
From the comparison report you can see only two errors remaining. That is
because the others have been checked, and where OS was wrong a not:name has been
tagged.
If
On 9 April 2011 08:49, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/2011 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
maxspeed:type=GB:dual_carriageway (or GB:motorway, GB:rural, GB:urban)
I don't like the urban/rural dichotomy for the UK as it doesn't correspond
to anything in the legislation here
On 09/04/11 08:20, Peter Miller wrote:
On 9 April 2011 08:15, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
mailto:peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 6 April 2011 16:53, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
mailto:e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Richard wrote:
I'd put the number for
Hello all,
Over the past couple of weeks, I've come up with a couple of interesting
walks from my house. I would like to publish these on my blog, in the
hopes that other people looking for walks in the area will find them.
However, I haven't yet worked out a good way to do this.
One thought I
On 9 April 2011 13:00, dan...@daniel-watkins.co.uk wrote:
Hello all,
Over the past couple of weeks, I've come up with a couple of interesting
walks from my house. I would like to publish these on my blog, in the
hopes that other people looking for walks in the area will find them.
However,
On 9 April 2011 11:46, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 09/04/11 08:20, Peter Miller wrote:
On 9 April 2011 08:15, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com mailto:
peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 6 April 2011 16:53, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
mailto:e...@loach.me.uk
Hello Dan,
There is Freemap which allows you to store your own walks, it does use OSM ways
but stores them locally. It doesn't use relations.
Not sure what other peoples thoughts would be but I'd guess storing them in OSM
itself would clutter up the database and it's best stored elsewhere.
On 09/04/2011 12:00, dan...@daniel-watkins.co.uk wrote:
Hello all,
Over the past couple of weeks, I've come up with a couple of interesting
walks from my house. I would like to publish these on my blog, in the
hopes that other people looking for walks in the area will find them.
However, I
On 09/04/2011 12:00, dan...@daniel-watkins.co.uk wrote:
At the other end of the spectrum is screenshots and using the GIMP to draw
my route on (or using a mapping site like BikeRouteToaster to draw the
lines on, and taking screenshots of that). However, this seems really
lame (as you lose all
14 matches
Mail list logo
