Hi everyone
Andrew Mackenzie, Andy Mabbett and I have been busy collaborating with the
AllotmentsData project at Leicester University. There's now a mappa mercia
wiki page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Allotments_Project to co-ordinate
activities
See you all at the social this week
Hello all,
We seem to be ending up with wildly conflicting use of 'lcn=yes',
'lcn_ref=*', and similar tags across Britain.
In London, these tags are used as you would expect - to map the
signposted London Cycle Network. It's pretty much in keeping with ncn=
and rcn= tagging.
In Worcester,
I've done a bulk of the Nottingham one (especially in the South and East)
and have generally followed the following rules (which others in the area
appear to have followed too)
1. If it's got NCN numbers it's NCN - From the last sign I continue it
until the next junction (e.g. NCN 15 is only
On 28/11/2011 18:29, SomeoneElse wrote:
The problem with proposed routes is that they don't exist yet and so
the usual on the ground check is difficult.
Then don't map them. Seriously, if these networks aren't at the
implementation stage, there's little point in adding them to OSM. Even
Someoneelse wrote:
Thanks Andy. Makes sense to me. Do you know if there is anywhere
a list of proposed Sustrans routes (not based on OS mapping
hopefully) that could be used for fact-checking some of the more
wishful proposed cycle ways in OSM?
Andy R and I have a list of three-digit NCN
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Then don't map them. Seriously, if these networks aren't at the
implementation stage, there's little point in adding them to OSM. Even
worse, if a route relies on some improvement work (e.g. clearing of a
railway trackbed) that hasn't been done, having the route there
I guess the big-society-defined ones can be ccn and Andy can include them
or not as he chooses.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
7 matches
Mail list logo
