What I wouldn't personally like is a mess where the Hampshire ROW line *and*
the line on the ground are *both* in OSM. This would make the data messy and
confusing to work with.
In cases like this maybe the ROW has, to all intents and purposes, shifted and
the Hampshire data is out-of-date.
Hi,
As promised I've put together a summary blog post on how I produced OpenHants
(simple site overlying the Hampshire rights-of-way data on a kothic-js based
OSM map), this can be found at:
http://www.free-map.org.uk/wordpress/?p=247
Nick
___
Hi Nick,
I agree that we don't want to take Hants data at face value and load this
into OSM where a path is already mapped. I have added my answers below:
Q1. Hampshire marked footpath and OSM footpath run very close to each other
(deviating by only a few meters max). No obvious marking on
3 matches
Mail list logo