[Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided

2013-05-07 Thread SomeoneElse
I recently added this note in Lincoln: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/note/1565 There are a number of problems here. The A15 here isn't a dual carriageway, and the roads between the southbound A15 and Pottergate consequentially don't exist. There may well be turn restrictions into and

Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided

2013-05-07 Thread Tom Chance
I have always operated on the assumption that you only split the road into two ways if they are physically separated by a barrier, I'm pretty sure that has been the consensus practice for a good six years. Regards, Tom On 7 May 2013 12:27, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: I

Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided

2013-05-07 Thread Jason Woollacott
+1 from me. Jason (UniEagle) From: Tom Chance Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:05 PM To: SomeoneElse Cc: talk-gb OSM List (E-mail) Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided I have always operated on the assumption that you only split

Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided

2013-05-07 Thread Philip Barnes
+1 from me too. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Usage of lanes / turn restrictions versus multiple ways when road is not divided

2013-05-07 Thread sk53.osm
Like others I agree that split roads must have some absolute barrier between them. If there is a traffic jam and it is possible to do a U-turn then the road should not be split. There are however a number of cases which might be a bit harder to call. I notice a revised road layout yesterday where