On 28 August 2013 23:15, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
This would perhaps suggest they should be marked as ways with barrier=hedge
and hedge=line_of_trees or perhaps just the latter.
An alternative might be to use natural=tree_row which is defined in the wiki
but the examples
The entire landcover tag discussion on the wiki is a huge distraction,and
not based on any objective criteria, let alone an attempt to see if what we
have works.
I, on the other hand, gave a paper at SotM-Eu in 2011 which showed that use
of existing tags could provide a level of
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Peter Miller wrote:
Thanks for that. Is there any chance that this ROW information can be
added to OSM? Possibly I am missing something, but it seems to be adding
complexity to have to fish around in another database for this
information.
Although I rarely contribute to
Rob,
This only seems to load if you are signed into Google. I try my best not to be
signed in these days ;) You might want to look into that.
Sam
From: Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: OpenStreetMap t...@openstreetmap.org; Talk-GB
Many thanks for the information. I'm afraid my knowledge of the detail you
provide is quite limited. I'll stick to natural=row_of_trees. As you suggest
it is likely to require the way to be marked on both sides. I hadn't thought
about using scrub on a way. For some reason the JOSM preset
Hmm, that's odd as I seem to see it fine with and without my google
account. Anyone else able to confirm this for me please?
The programme will be making it's way onto Lanyrd soon so you should be
able to view it there. Lanyrd has a great website designed for mobile
devices (and a dedicated app)
Confirmed the programme worked on:
Linux: Chrome (incognito mode so logged out) and Firefox.
The box does flicker with some message (loading Google Drive I think)
first though.
It looks like Friday's schedule has been added to Lanyrd already, check
back in another day or two and the guys might
7 matches
Mail list logo
